Titlebook: Gandhi inthe Twenty First Century; Ideas and Relevance Anshuman Behera,Shailesh Nayak Book 2022 National Institute of Advanced Studies 2022

heart-murmur

無脊椎

油氈

Book 2022eaceful resolution of conflicts. In particular, it looks at the contemporary societies‘ critical issues and offers solutions through the prism of Gandhian ideas. Written in an accessible style, this book reintroduces Gandhi to today‘s audiences in relevant terms.

scrutiny

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64458-1tal challenges. Departing from a body of literature that confines Gandhi and his ideas to a specific time, this chapter holds the view that Gandhian ideas transcend time. Accordingly, the chapter stresses on the critical need for revisiting Gandhi’s ideas keeping in mind the challenges that the soci

inclusive

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16855-2 and subjugated nature is very suitable for the West. Gandhi argues for self-rule or Swaraj for East and West. He pleads for the reconstruction of democracy from within the self. He adopts a concept of the oceanic circle, which presupposes the flow of democratic power from within and from below in ‘

免除責任

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230286788oals, otherwise known, is a universal call by the United Nations (UN) to work towards ending poverty, protecting the planet, and ensuring peace and prosperity for all the individuals by 2030. The idea of sustainable development, as desired in contemporary times, whilst matches with the Gandhian visi

abnegate

Anglo-Jewish Women Writing the Holocausthasized utility or rights, liberal conceptions of justice, rested upon the idea that justice was the concern of a consent-based state authority. Such liberal accounts (no matter the differences between them) accepted the rule of law administered by a third party and an abstract equality before such

intrigue

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6314-1. The market-led governance and public policy paradigm have limited the scope for autonomy and universalism, for instance, ‘. and ‘.—in governance and public policy. The Gandhian paradigm of development provides an appropriate context to examine the ills of the dominant paradigm of neoliberal inspir

生氣的邊緣

Polydipsia

,From Peace to War and Back (1991–2002),andhian Science (GS)— the quandary of neither being an ‘unmixed’ enthusiast of science nor a ‘sentimental’ advocate of tradition—lies at the heart of contemporary contestations about what science means for the oriental societies, for instance, India. This paper thus attempts to conceptualize GS and