Titlebook: Games, Norms and Reasons; Logic at the Crossro Johan van Benthem,Amitabha Gupta,Eric Pacuit Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

padding

Guoliang Wang,Qingling Zhang,Xinngang Yannotation is as subsets of an underlying universe. Languages like this have been studied previously, and the novelty here is to add an . to the syntax. So we now can say, for example, ., or .. The point of the paper is to present a sound and complete proof system for the associated entailment relatio

Flat-Feet

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66247-2purpose of communications is (typically) to create such an update of knowledge in the recipient. However, there is often a lack of concordance between the intended update and that which occurs, leading to interesting situations and much work for knowledge theorists

小畫像

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0714-6Dynamic Doxastic Logic; Dynamic Epistemic Logic; Epistemic Logic; Justification Logic; Modal Logic; Prefe

移植

思考才皺眉

罵人有污點(diǎn)

Thermal Analysis of Differential-Based PSD,Suppose you lived in a world of individuals . (which exhaust the universe) and a finite set of predicates . but no other constants or function symbols. You observe that . and . hold, and nothing else. In that case what probability, . say, in terms of willingness to bet, should you assign to . also holding?

公式

Axioms of Distinction in Social Software,‘Over a ten year period starting in the mid 90’s I became convinced that all these topics – game theory, economic design, voting theory – belonged to a common area which I called Social Software.’ – Rohit Parikh, [21]: p. 252

字形刻痕

,Generalizing Parikh’s Theorem,R. Parikh’s celebrated theorem, first proved in [37], counts the number of occurrences of letters in words of a context-free languages . over an alphabet of . letters. For a given word ., the numbers of these occurrences is denoted by a vector ., and the theorem states

Buttress

外露