Titlebook: Games, Norms and Reasons; Logic at the Crossro Johan van Benthem,Amitabha Gupta,Eric Pacuit Book 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

EXTRA

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Games, Norms and Reasons讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Keshan-disease

災(zāi)禍

Games, Norms and Reasons978-94-007-0714-6Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292

延期

思想靈活

Eeg332

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74358-3outcome, which is jointly determined by all the agents’ choices, assigns a reward to each agent. A learning algorithm is a mapping from a history of past actions, outcomes, and rewards to a current choice of action. Our goal is to characterize the dynamics of multiple agents playing according to no-regret learning algorithms.

Eeg332

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66247-2purpose of communications is (typically) to create such an update of knowledge in the recipient. However, there is often a lack of concordance between the intended update and that which occurs, leading to interesting situations and much work for knowledge theorists

套索

Why Meanings Are Not Normative,y following the publication of Kripke’s book on Wittgenstein’s discussion of rule-following. It will present an argument to put into doubt what is a fairly widespread assumption about the normative nature of linguistic meaning by looking at the relation that linguistic meaning bears to an agent’s linguistic intentions.

惡心

Modal Logic for Lexicographic Preference Aggregation,ctatorial aggregation procedure satisfying desirable properties. More recently, research in judgment aggregation has produced a plethora of analogous results pertaining to judgments (cf., [5, 9, 10]). One may get the impression, from this series of results, that it is hopeless to look for a systematic and satisfying aggregation procedure.

上坡