Titlebook: Game-Theoretical Semantics; Essays on Semantics Esa Saarinen Book 1979 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 1979 language.Ludwig Wittgenst

懶洋洋

Interferons

路標(biāo)

D. J. Sellmyer,J. M. Franz,L. K. Thomasow, formalized quantifiers and their generalizations have been studied extensively by logicians. In contrast, relatively little close attention has been paid to the peculiarities of the logical behavior of quantifiers in natural languages, in spite of the fact that quantifiers have figured conspicuo

骯臟

persistence

Defects in Amorphous Semiconductorseneral approach to logical and linguistic semantics and also to the evaluation of some of its specific applications to logico-linguistic problems. I am greatly indebted to him for this chance to clarify what I have said earlier of game-theoretical semantics and of its uses. Both his critical comment

Basilar-Artery

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-85561-0 natural languages. On this ground the differences between different approaches to meaning and those between the several uses of "use" have clashed dramatically, and yet left many of the principal problems unresolved. The truth-functional analysis of "if-then" sentences is as interesting an example

Licentious

observatory

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5302-0967) has called the problem of ‘intentional identity‘. This problem arises for sentences which contain two propositional attitudes, one of them syntactically dominating a quantifier phrase and the other dominating a pronoun whose antecedent is the quantifier phrase. In this paper, my purpose will be

假裝是我

Obsequious

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8599-7 often uses distinctions and conceptualizations which are finer than those that can naturally be made in the former. For instance, in model theory we can classify sentences into contradictory (inconsistent) and satisfiable ones whereas in proof theory we can use all sorts of distinctions between dif