找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract; A Comparative Analys Daniel Zatorski Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 54442|回復(fù): 37
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:18:23 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract
副標(biāo)題A Comparative Analys
編輯Daniel Zatorski
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/381/380323/380323.mp4
概述Provides a comparative analysis of an emerging problem in contract law.Applies to the work of common law and civil law pracitioners alike.Focuses on both English law and Polish law
圖書封面Titlebook: Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract; A Comparative Analys Daniel Zatorski Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s),
描述.This book focuses on an emerging problem in English contract law: what should be done when a party has been unjustly enriched as the result of a breach of contract but there is no measurable loss suffered by said party? Two rulings are at the heart of the book: Wrotham Park Estate v Parkside Homes and Attorney-General v Blake. These two cases can be said to have established gain-based remedies in English contract law. However, the principles that underpin these remedies are not entirely clear and are subject to debate..This book analyses these principles through the lens of compensatory and restitutionary approaches. Moreover, it applies a comparative analysis of these approaches through the lens of the civil law jurisdiction in Poland..Since the term ‘compensation’ is not a universal concept, the book distinguishes between two rationales in the compensatory analysis. The first, reparative compensation, is defined as a form of monetary recompense for loss or damage actually suffered. The second, substitutive compensation, represents a monetary equivalent to a right that a person has been deprived of or denied. Both rationales require the application of a broad notion of loss in or
出版日期Book 2023
關(guān)鍵詞Gain-Based Remedies; Breach Of Contract; Disgorgement; Damages; Unjust Enrichment; compensatory principle
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25452-9
isbn_softcover978-3-031-25454-3
isbn_ebook978-3-031-25452-9
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract被引頻次




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract年度引用




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract讀者反饋




書目名稱Gain-based Remedies for Breach of Contract讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:47:41 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:24:31 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:55:37 | 只看該作者
Gain-Based Remedies for Breach of Contract in General, most notable for shaping these remedies. Firstly, the 1973 case of . in which Steyn LJ awarded so-called . which are “assessed according to the price which the claimant could reasonably have charged the defendant for releasing the defendant from the obligation that has been broken had the defendant
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:08:33 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:52:46 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:25:39 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:50:33 | 只看該作者
Advances in Chemical Signals in Vertebrateslish legal system. To illustrate this in greater detail, under English law the normal route to take when a contract is breached is for the claimant to claim damages for the loss suffered. Such a route becomes more complicated when the claimant does not suffer any measurable loss, and yet the defenda
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:00:42 | 只看該作者
Ying-Chan Tang,Fen-May Liou,Sheng-Yao Pengt the . and . remedies are compensatory. To make this clear, when writing about both the . remedy and the . remedy together, I will refer to them as .. When writing individually about these cases, I will refer to the . remedy as ., while to the . remedy as .. The comparative argument I wish to put f
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:53:47 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 23:20
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
和林格尔县| 长岭县| 涿州市| 临武县| 绍兴县| 徐水县| 洪洞县| 宁津县| 昌图县| 罗平县| 盐山县| 西城区| 同仁县| 海城市| 宾川县| 乌兰县| 万山特区| 子长县| 淮阳县| 通州市| 西青区| 临邑县| 武功县| 穆棱市| 建水县| 全椒县| 博湖县| 定远县| 万载县| 西乡县| 新和县| 镶黄旗| 许昌市| 石渠县| 繁峙县| 双鸭山市| 南康市| 崇阳县| 夏邑县| 安阳县| 永春县|