| 書目名稱 | From Metaphysics to Rhetoric | | 編輯 | Michel Meyer | | 視頻video | http://file.papertrans.cn/349/348791/348791.mp4 | | 叢書名稱 | Synthese Library | | 圖書封面 |  | | 描述 | by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach? In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation? When Socrates asked, for example, "What is virtue?", he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incom | | 出版日期 | Book 1989 | | 關鍵詞 | Argument; Argumentation; formal logic; logic; metaphysics | | 版次 | 1 | | doi | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2593-9 | | isbn_softcover | 978-94-010-7672-2 | | isbn_ebook | 978-94-009-2593-9Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292 | | issn_series | 0166-6991 | | copyright | Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1989 |
The information of publication is updating
|
|
|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋|
派博傳思國際
( 京公網安備110108008328)
GMT+8, 2025-10-8 09:45
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:45:47
