Titlebook: Explorations of the Life-World; Continuing Dialogues Martin Endress,George Psathas,Hisashi Nasu Book 2005 Springer Science+Business Media B

supplementary

書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World被引頻次




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World年度引用




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World讀者反饋




書目名稱Explorations of the Life-World讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

set598

尖叫

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85901-3f the scientists. Theory of science is about basic concepts and methods. For Schutz, all science is theoretical, which makes the question of application clearer, and cultural science addresses the field of objects always already interpreted in everyday life. Scientifically social science differs fro

Forage飼料

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-87927-1the social sciences and to an extent even in philosophy. However, much debate and even entrenched positions in regard to them in the social sciences primarily occur only by a reliance upon their mediated reinterpretation as abstract units within later theories and without regard to their original em

hysterectomy

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04492-3this aim, I first discuss the methodological postulates formulated by Schutz for the construction of social scientific constructs, considering their relations as well as his intention in formulating each of them. Second, I paraphrase his arguments about “types of knowledge,” i.e., the “expert,” the

剝皮

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81905-5 purposes for which each of these sociologists made use of the construct. Weber’s focus on substantive empirical historical and comparative problems led him to select the ideal type as a methodology suited for making comparisons between the type and empirical reality..Schutz’s original interest in t

剝皮

詼諧

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-13186-1 a comparison of Arendt’s “space of appearance” with Schutz’s “musical space.” I conclude that they have similarities as well as differences in two respects: first, both indicate a space of common appearances in direct communication within the actual reach, that is, the space being seen and heard si

Audiometry

Michael Kleinaltenkamp,Wulff Plinke be understood as a synthesis of forms of speech, action and thought whose basic structures can be disclosed by the means of Schutzian theory of the life-world. It is shown that the Schutzian approach, stressing the innerwordly transcendence of multiple realities on the one hand and the necessity to

chance

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07893-7ecognize the significance of this interpretation, yet I question whether practical action alone is sufficient to explain the variety of life-world experiences. The long neglected notions like transcendence and appresentation in Schutz are explored in this paper to treat this question.