找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ezumezu; A System of Logic fo Jonathan O. Chimakonam Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: CYNIC
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:29:36 | 只看該作者
Justifying the System of Ezumezu Logic: An Analysis of the Problematic Structure of ‘q na abughi q’itted exercise of investigating the structure: ‘q na abughi q’ which I suppose to be the hub of all controversies surrounding the logic question in African philosophy in this contemporary time. I will conclude following the insight of W. V. O. Quine that bad translators are responsible for the creat
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:17:44 | 只看該作者
tle. African philosophers can now ground their discourses in Ezumezu logic which will distinguish their philosophy as a tradition in its own right. On the whole, the book engages with some of the lingering con978-3-030-11075-8
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:17:33 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 11:38:24 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:08:06 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/b138374philosophy through the framework of Ezumezu. To accomplish this task, I seek to mount a defence for postmodern thinking and then project Ezumezu from this methodological purview. To do all this, I will first demolish the pretensions of European philosophy weaved into the modern mindview which errone
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:45:07 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:46:12 | 只看該作者
Paula Agostinho,Catarina R. Oliveira pillars of Ezumezu logic namely, nwa-nsa, nwa-nju and nwa-izugbe already discussed in the preceding chapter. Finally, I will demonstrate the formal structure of Ezumezu logic using its two argument types called arumaristic and ohakaristic to show how conclusions could be drawn from premises.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:42:39 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:45:59 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:27:43 | 只看該作者
e logic system for grounding African philosophy and studies.The issue of a logic foundation for African thought connects well with the question of method. Do we need new methods for African philosophy and studies? Or, are the methods of Western thought adequate for African intellectual space? These
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 17:24
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
广丰县| 富阳市| 宁河县| 襄樊市| 中超| 曲周县| 盐山县| 刚察县| 仁怀市| 房山区| 陕西省| 永嘉县| 香格里拉县| 余干县| 勃利县| 辉南县| 洛浦县| 雅江县| 邯郸县| 淳安县| 武宣县| 和政县| 云和县| 廊坊市| 额尔古纳市| 隆德县| 海安县| 雷波县| 临泽县| 磴口县| 大冶市| 贵州省| 昌平区| 冕宁县| 岳池县| 城固县| 伊宁县| 徐水县| 忻城县| 夏津县| 建德市|