Titlebook: Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court; The Duties of Peacek Jan Altgelt Book 2024 The Editor(s) (if applicabl

Concave

書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court被引頻次




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court年度引用




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court讀者反饋




書目名稱Extraterritorial Apprehensions for the International Criminal Court讀者反饋學科排名

精確

Case Study on MONUSCO, UNOCI and UNAMID, (MONUSCO, UNOCI and UNAMID). The practice of the Security Council and of these three peace support operations themselves points to the perpetuation of selectivity in favour of the government of the host State. MONUSC, UNOCI and UNAMID proved largely unwilling and/or unable to assist the ICC with ar

chassis

Potential Sources of Law for a Duty to Apprehend Core Criminals,examined whether the duty to cooperate in the ICC Statute and the prosecution obligations arising from international humanitarian and human rights law apply extraterritorially. This analysis results in the following findings: The obligations to investigate in most of the treaties that are analysed i

aggressor

Sovereignty-Based Limitations on Extraterritorially Apprehending Core Criminals,reignty of other States and, second, the prohibition of the use of force in Article 2(4) of the UN Charter. Overall, an extraterritorial deprivation of liberty .violates the sovereignty of the territorial State, and, if the threshold of gravity is met, may also violate the prohibition of the use of

善辯

International Humanitarian Law,and transfer to the ICC. In situations of . armed conflict, the extraterritorial apprehension of suspects is in principle permitted: Under the law of occupation, Article 43 of the Hague Regulations and Article 64 of Geneva Convention IV grant the occupant the authority (and the duty) to maintain pub

磨碎

International Human Rights Law,and security and, second, the principle of non-refoulement..On the first obligation, States can guarantee the right to liberty and security, as set out in Article 5 ECHR and Article 9 ICCPR, also in an extraterritorial context if they respect the different aspects of the main criterion of ‘lawfulnes

磨碎

humectant

自傳

捏造