找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic; Nimrod Bar-Am Book 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Aristotle.Gottfried Wilhelm Lei

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 兩邊在擴散
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 23:11:01 | 只看該作者
Taxonomy of Reality by Syllogismences of his notion of term over his notion of taxonomy statement (and thus) over his notion of syllogism. My aim was neither to criticize these notions nor the system as a whole, of course, but rather to note the knotty package deal that they comprised. It was a tough, take-it-whole-or-leave-it, pa
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:53:07 | 只看該作者
Logic: Logic between Aristotle and Boolemuch interesting material and of many interesting periods in the history of logic. Megarian and Stoic logic are mentioned now only in passing and to a very limited end. Significant works of Aristotle’s followers (Greek, Roman, Arabic and scholastic) are ignored here. We are about to leap forward in
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:32:22 | 只看該作者
The Neglect of Judgmentsical problems were: (1) What judgment is analytic? (2) What judgments are analytic? Today we are used to formal logic so much that we easily concentrate on the title “analytic” and forget all about the meaningful, portentous, term “judgment”, and ignore its influence upon the history of logic. Logi
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:05:52 | 只看該作者
Leibniz as Aristotle and Boole Conflateds well as one of the greatest thinkers ever, and yet his profoundest achievements as a logician were magnificent outlines of a grand program that was doomed to failure. He was a prophet whose insistence on the immediate actualizing of ideals had forced his followers to notice the impossibility of do
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:22:14 | 只看該作者
Why Transcendental Logic is no Logic at Allic slumber. Is it not a little puzzling? Hume explicitly criticized Locke’s philosophy of science: he portrayed the limits of Locke’s empiricism. Kant (even in his deepest of dogmatic slumbers) was no advocate of Locke’s philosophy of science. He was certainly no empiricist. Rather, to the extant th
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:57:54 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:30:23 | 只看該作者
Mathematical Logic: An Oxymoronindsight comes naturally: the antecedents require reconstruction. Extensionalism is no exception. Fascinating, detailed studies of the hindsight perspective comprise investigations into 18th and early 19th century mathematics. They emphasize every precursor to extensionalism. They often show that in
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:43:30 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:31:24 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:38:55 | 只看該作者
Peter Parker,Joyce Mokhesi-Parkerentary conceptions of logical proof that we know of. It is appropriate to begin, then, with a few notes on Parmenides poem, for Parmenides has been called ‘the father of logical proof’ and even ‘the father of logical indirect proof.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 17:56
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
义马市| 北碚区| 甘孜| 昌平区| 顺平县| 台东市| 霍城县| 永登县| 台前县| 体育| 县级市| 宣武区| 崇州市| 秦皇岛市| 砚山县| 鄂托克前旗| 新巴尔虎右旗| 上杭县| 崇仁县| 平山县| 波密县| 霞浦县| 镇巴县| 新泰市| 清河县| 沈丘县| 偏关县| 罗江县| 云林县| 昌乐县| 玛沁县| 新乐市| 丰镇市| 东乡族自治县| 石棉县| 台东市| 尚志市| 凤庆县| 井冈山市| 东丽区| 日喀则市|