找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Extensionalism: The Revolution in Logic; Nimrod Bar-Am Book 2008 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008 Aristotle.Gottfried Wilhelm Lei

[復(fù)制鏈接]
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 23:11:01 | 只看該作者
Taxonomy of Reality by Syllogismences of his notion of term over his notion of taxonomy statement (and thus) over his notion of syllogism. My aim was neither to criticize these notions nor the system as a whole, of course, but rather to note the knotty package deal that they comprised. It was a tough, take-it-whole-or-leave-it, pa
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:53:07 | 只看該作者
Logic: Logic between Aristotle and Boolemuch interesting material and of many interesting periods in the history of logic. Megarian and Stoic logic are mentioned now only in passing and to a very limited end. Significant works of Aristotle’s followers (Greek, Roman, Arabic and scholastic) are ignored here. We are about to leap forward in
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:32:22 | 只看該作者
The Neglect of Judgmentsical problems were: (1) What judgment is analytic? (2) What judgments are analytic? Today we are used to formal logic so much that we easily concentrate on the title “analytic” and forget all about the meaningful, portentous, term “judgment”, and ignore its influence upon the history of logic. Logi
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:05:52 | 只看該作者
Leibniz as Aristotle and Boole Conflateds well as one of the greatest thinkers ever, and yet his profoundest achievements as a logician were magnificent outlines of a grand program that was doomed to failure. He was a prophet whose insistence on the immediate actualizing of ideals had forced his followers to notice the impossibility of do
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 16:22:14 | 只看該作者
Why Transcendental Logic is no Logic at Allic slumber. Is it not a little puzzling? Hume explicitly criticized Locke’s philosophy of science: he portrayed the limits of Locke’s empiricism. Kant (even in his deepest of dogmatic slumbers) was no advocate of Locke’s philosophy of science. He was certainly no empiricist. Rather, to the extant th
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 18:57:54 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 00:30:23 | 只看該作者
Mathematical Logic: An Oxymoronindsight comes naturally: the antecedents require reconstruction. Extensionalism is no exception. Fascinating, detailed studies of the hindsight perspective comprise investigations into 18th and early 19th century mathematics. They emphasize every precursor to extensionalism. They often show that in
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:43:30 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:31:24 | 只看該作者
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:38:55 | 只看該作者
Peter Parker,Joyce Mokhesi-Parkerentary conceptions of logical proof that we know of. It is appropriate to begin, then, with a few notes on Parmenides poem, for Parmenides has been called ‘the father of logical proof’ and even ‘the father of logical indirect proof.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 19:50
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
金阳县| 垣曲县| 雷波县| 邮箱| 宜兴市| 洮南市| 莱阳市| 南安市| 广饶县| 如皋市| 靖远县| 睢宁县| 边坝县| 商城县| 宣城市| 沙雅县| 丽江市| 南平市| 高雄市| 通山县| 聂拉木县| 永安市| 阳江市| 离岛区| 阳新县| 墨竹工卡县| 静安区| 麻城市| 新兴县| 治多县| 贡山| 镇赉县| 淮安市| 郎溪县| 正镶白旗| 西昌市| 广汉市| 蓬溪县| 定陶县| 潮安县| 永丰县|