Titlebook: Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales; Julian V. Roberts (Professor of Criminology) Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division

大小

書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales被引頻次




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales年度引用




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales讀者反饋




書目名稱Exploring Sentencing Practice in England and Wales讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Gossamer

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245433stinction in the guidelines is between factors taken into account at step one (when determining the offence category) and factors considered at step two, which serve to modify the assessment of overall seriousness . the range of the offence category. In the new format guidelines, judges are instructed as follows:.

增強(qiáng)

龍卷風(fēng)

,Sentencing Practices and Trends, 1999–2013, reason for asking for other offences to be taken into account is that although additional punishment will be imposed, the offender is likely to benefit from some reduction for having freely conceded the crimes.

松軟無力

onlooker

onlooker

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-08784-6towards a law abiding life, and that responding appropriately and effectively to the problems that bring women into the criminal justice system require a distinct approach. (Justice Select Committee report: .. Second Report of Sessions 2013–2014. London: House of Commons.)

抵制

Conclusion: “Made in Hong Kong” Design, particularly if the priors are the same as the current conviction. (For findings and discussion, see Roberts and Hough, 2011; Roberts, 2008, chapter 8.) Thus, when asked to sentence offenders with different numbers of prior convictions, the public respond more puni-tively to recidivists compared to first offenders.

GEN

debouch