Titlebook: Exploring Risk Communication; Jan M. Gutteling,Oene Wiegman Book 1996 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996 Emotion.Evaluation.co

同來核對

Hazards and Risks,h can be considered as disasters by any standard: a jet fighter crashed in a residential area, a relatively strong earthquake, an enormous explosion and following fire at a chemical plant, several train crashes and two major air catastrophes, with the crashing of a Boeing cargo plane in the outskirts of Amsterdam even having global repercussions.

NIB

Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Researchhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/319569.jpg

debase

Book 1996tion, focusing on perceived trust andcredibility of risk communication sources, and arguments in riskmessages, risk comparison, and framing of risk. Special attention ispaid to the mass media context of risks and its impact on publicperception. Finally, the potential of the new interactive media for

FLAGR

Risk Communication,receiver of the information also attributes a meaning to the information. The sender can express a particular intention with a message, but the receiver can interpret the message in his or her own manner, which could be quite different from the sender’s intention. This implies communication can have

Verify

instulate

傷心

Commonwealth

The Sources of Risk Messages,related solutions to solve these source-related problems. The error may be to overlook other essential properties of the risk communication process, e.g. regarding the audience’s perception, the message content or structure, or the communications medium used. The systematic planning approach should

匍匐前進

條街道往前推