Titlebook: Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis; Paul J. H. Schoemaker Book 1980 Springer Science+Business Media Dord

Malinger

書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis被引頻次




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis年度引用




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis讀者反饋




書目名稱Experiments on Decisions under Risk: The Expected Utility Hypothesis讀者反饋學科排名

音樂等

Alternative Descriptive Models,ew of the various classes of models, while the second discusses the so-called holistic judgment models, most of which are modifications of EU theory and fall into the category of “as-if” models. Rather than claiming to offer descriptions of the decision process, these models purport to predict behav

平淡而無味

An Experimental Study of Insurance Decisons,ams, 1966). Unlike speculative risk choices, pure risk alternatives offer no chance of gain. The present study ran parallel to another research effort, also based at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. This other effort consisted of field studies (Kunreuther et al., 1978) and labor

Arresting

Intellectual

Risk Taking and Problem Context in the Domain of Losses,in the loss domain. The second involves the influence that a gamble’s context or presentation exerts on revealed risk-taking attitudes. These questions were examined through an experimental design in which probabilities, probabilistic losses, and premiums were systematically varied (see Table 7.1 an

LUDE

LUDE

scrip- tive validity of expected utility theory as a model of choice under uncer- tainty. His principal message is that this paradigm is too narrow in its con- ception and misses some of the important elements of a descriptive model of individual choice. In particular, Schoemaker calls attention to

保守

Wilhelm Bauer,Stefan Rief,Mitja Jurecic the attribute(s) under consideration. Both of these elements are captured through a utility function so that maximizing expected utility becomes the guide to rational behavior in more complex situations.

Exposition

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77371-7 were familiar with statistics (particularly such concepts as expected value, random variable, and expected utility theory) were significantly more calculative (i.e., less intuitive) than were those who did not know any of these concepts..

nuclear-tests

Book 1980e validity of expected utility theory as a model of choice under uncer- tainty. His principal message is that this paradigm is too narrow in its con- ception and misses some of the important elements of a descriptive model of individual choice. In particular, Schoemaker calls attention to the impor-