Titlebook: Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox; Contemporary Discuss Maurice Allais,Ole Hagen Book 1979 Springer Science+Business Media

HABIT

書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox被引頻次




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox年度引用




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox讀者反饋




書目名稱Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Incommensurate

膠狀

LIMIT

Mitigate

BANAL

Marius van der Put,Michael F. Singer function has certain properties. The paper gives a brief survey of the relationships between the utility functions and stochastic dominance of different orders. It is pointed out that the principle of stochastic dominance of the first order is the main axiom in the theory which Allais outlined in 1

BANAL

climax

Results from Algebraic Number Theory,ual formulation of decision theory the utility function is assumed to be known and fixed. The assumption of a fixed utility function gives rise to inconsistencies of the type illustrated by the ‘Allais paradox’. We have explored a series of examples in which the individual compares the expected util

instill

,-Klassengruppe und ,-Klassenk?rperturm,dence axiom, and an Archimedean condition. It is argued that the core of their idea is captured by parts of their first two axioms, namely that ? on . is asymmetric, and that λ. + (1– λ). ? λ. + (1– λ). whenever 0 < λ < 1, . ? . and . ? ..These less demanding axioms overcome criticisms of the origin

同步左右

The Second Week: Equivalence Classeson of the St. Petersburg game. The puzzle is that it seems reasonable to refuse to play the game, contrary to Bayesian analysis, yet the game is immune to Jeffrey’s original objections. A partially systematic account of the rationality of refusal can be based on the observation that in making decisi