找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics; Arguments and Practi Dorothee Riese Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u

[復制鏈接]
查看: 44433|回復: 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:24:27 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics
副標題Arguments and Practi
編輯Dorothee Riese
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/319/318459/318459.mp4
概述Combines political theory and empirical analysis of executive secrecy’s place in democratic systems.Addresses inherent challenges faced by parliamentary democracies when it comes to enclosing executiv
叢書名稱New Perspectives in German Political Studies
圖書封面Titlebook: Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics; Arguments and Practi Dorothee Riese Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), u
描述.This book investigates the parliamentary negotiation of executive secrecy. Parliaments depend on information to fulfil their roles as the people’s representatives, legislators and overseers of the executive. However, there are examples of executive secrecy across all policy fields. How, then, do parliamentary actors try to reconcile secrecy and the normative demands of an open, democratic society? This volume analyses parliamentary arguments, conflicts and patterns of agreement around this topic in the case of Germany. Based on two case studies – intelligence agencies secrecy and Public Private Partnership secrecy – it argues that substantive justifications of secrecy focusing on necessity are highly contested. By contrast, procedural legitimation of secrecy, namely deciding about it democratically, is crucial. Still, there are inherent limits to the legitimation of executive secrecy. The book therefore underlines the fragility of secrecy’s legitimation, and its need for constant actualisation..
出版日期Book 2023
關(guān)鍵詞German Politics; Democracy; Secrecy; Public-private Partnerships; Intelligence Agencies; Oversight; Democr
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30605-1
isbn_softcover978-3-031-30607-5
isbn_ebook978-3-031-30605-1Series ISSN 2947-6747 Series E-ISSN 2947-6755
issn_series 2947-6747
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics被引頻次




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics年度引用




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics讀者反饋




書目名稱Executive Secrecy and Democratic Politics讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:02:39 | 只看該作者
Theorising and Studying Democratic Secrecy,ectation (Westerbarkey, Das Geheimnis: Zur funktionalen Ambivalenz von Kommunikationsstrukturen, Westdeutscher Verlag, 1991). It discusses the social relevance of secrecy that can be derived from sociological theory as a basis for an analysis of political secrecy. Also, it traces the concept of poli
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:00:16 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:03:06 | 只看該作者
,Legitimising Public–Private Partnerships Secrecy,erns in justifying secrecy. Much conflict ignites over the issue of the desirability of PPPs as such. If they are considered a worthwhile instrument of public procurement, secrecy is justified as a necessary feature of their success. By contrast, critics question whether private business secrets sho
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:13:52 | 只看該作者
Patterns and Limits of Legitimising Executive Secrecy,timation of executive secrecy across policy areas and discusses case-specific issues. In both cases, substantive legitimation of secrecy proved insufficient since it was highly contested. Procedural legitimation addresses this gap. However, the comparison shows that the level of procedural legitimat
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:37:10 | 只看該作者
Avenues for Research and Political Practice, information. Executive secrecy, it seems, has no place in a democracy. In political practice, though, secrecy remains ubiquitous. This final chapter discusses implications arising from the analysis of the two case studies, intelligence and Public–Private Partnership secrecy. First, it lays out an a
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:24:55 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30605-1German Politics; Democracy; Secrecy; Public-private Partnerships; Intelligence Agencies; Oversight; Democr
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:47:37 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:05:44 | 只看該作者
New Perspectives in German Political Studieshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/318459.jpg
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:17:45 | 只看該作者
978-3-031-30607-5The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-5 07:44
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
达日县| 昭平县| 甘谷县| 新沂市| 封开县| 天津市| 渝中区| 揭东县| 贵德县| 鞍山市| 永嘉县| 靖江市| 金华市| 南靖县| 门头沟区| 华宁县| 定结县| 大冶市| 张家港市| 仙游县| 宜昌市| 淳安县| 泗阳县| 塔河县| 元江| 兰坪| 临潭县| 许昌市| 城步| 连州市| 突泉县| 乐亭县| 互助| 武汉市| 伊吾县| 宿松县| 泰和县| 博白县| 师宗县| 行唐县| 湘潭市|