Titlebook: Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt; D’Maris Coffman Book 2013 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2

Kennedy

書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt被引頻次




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt年度引用




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt讀者反饋




書目名稱Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

笨拙處理

揉雜

煩憂

https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137371553economy; political economy; science and technology; taxation

Graduated

Loren B. Landau,Iriann Freemantlest historians agree that in the British Isles the transition from a late medieval demesne-state to a tax state occurred in the seventeenth century, culminating in the Financial Revolution of the 1690s (Schumpeter, 1918; Braddick, 1994, pp. 1–21).. Yet no major work of scholarship has looked closely

ablate

Introduction: Medieval by a Month,ical negotiations that led to the imposition of the excises in July 1643 helps to explain why this outcome is so surprising. By employing previously under-used sources in the National Archives, the Bodleian Library and the British Library, it is possible to reconstruct how the parliamentary excise w

ablate

Virginia Kinnear,Erich Ch. Wittmannere servants of the state, had been hired for their willingness to make loans to the government in advance of receipts. When they proved unable to meet Parliament’s borrowing requirements, private parties were permitted to make loans with the revenue from these ordinances as security. There is a gen

不適

會(huì)犯錯(cuò)誤

Germano Resconi,Masoud Nikravesheceive separate treatment in the scholarly literature. The ‘Soap Makers Complaint’ of 1650 offers an opportunity to view disputes about the excise on soap through the lens of the controversies attendant to the earlier soap patents. Rather than offering evidence for generalised resistance to the exci

富足女人