找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument; Veronika Weidner Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 J. L. Schell

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 48007|回復(fù): 36
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:34:11 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument
編輯Veronika Weidner
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/319/318215/318215.mp4
概述Offers a sympathetic but rigorous analysis of Schellenberg’s hiddenness argument.Challenges the truth of one decisive subpremise of Schellenberg’s argument.Approaches the riddle of divine hiddenness s
叢書名稱Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion
圖書封面Titlebook: Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument;  Veronika Weidner Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 J. L. Schell
描述This book examines the so-called hiddenness argument of the Canadian philosopher John L. Schellenberg. ?The hiddenness of God is a topic evincing a rich tradition in the monotheistic religions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. Rather recently, an argument emerged claiming that the hiddenness of God reveals on closer inspection the non-existence of God. Some say that Schellenberg′s hiddenness argument is likely as forceful as the argument from evil rendering theism rather implausible or even false. In this book, an account of the traditional theistic notion of divine hiddenness is presented, which contrasts sharply from Schellenberg′s use of the term. Moreover, a well-needed detailed exposition of the premises of the hiddenness argument is offered, thereby preparing the ground for an even more in-depth future hiddenness debate. Furthermore, a reply to the argument is given which challenges the truth of one specific subpremise, according to which belief that God exists is necessary in order to personally relate to God. Even though a plausible case is made that the hiddenness argument is unsound, it is beyond dispute that the argument deserves more serious reflection by theists and
出版日期Book 2018
關(guān)鍵詞J; L; Schellenberg; anti-theism; atheism; theologumenon; scepticism
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97517-7
isbn_softcover978-3-030-40496-3
isbn_ebook978-3-319-97517-7Series ISSN 2634-6176 Series E-ISSN 2634-6184
issn_series 2634-6176
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument被引頻次




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument年度引用




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument讀者反饋




書目名稱Examining Schellenberg‘s Hiddenness Argument讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:36:03 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:11:05 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:43:31 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:57:27 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:52:32 | 只看該作者
Its Most Recent Statementmises. That is, Weidner explicates Schellenberg’s concepts of divine relational-personal love and God’s openness for relationship (premises 1 and 2), belief and non-belief that God exists as well as the role of experiential evidence, i.e., religious experience (premise 4), and four different types of nonresistant nonbelievers (premise 6).
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:45:48 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:56:12 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 04:48:20 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:15:06 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 09:47
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
卓尼县| 永修县| 潞西市| 大方县| 锦州市| 专栏| 克山县| 清涧县| 庄河市| 方山县| 芮城县| 彭阳县| 和政县| 萨迦县| 枣庄市| 微山县| 青冈县| 博野县| 罗甸县| 黄山市| 凌海市| 鄄城县| 娱乐| 汉寿县| 平定县| 如东县| 澄城县| 龙泉市| 吴堡县| 屏边| 抚宁县| 武宁县| 沅江市| 浦城县| 梁山县| 农安县| 苍山县| 正镶白旗| 曲沃县| 曲麻莱县| 福贡县|