Titlebook: Evolutionary Developmental Biology; Brian K. Hall Book 1999Latest edition Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1999 Metazoa.developme

桌前不可入

書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology被引頻次




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology年度引用




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology讀者反饋




書目名稱Evolutionary Developmental Biology讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

FRAUD

Types of Animals: Kingdoms, Phyla, Relationshipss. These differences appear anew in each generation and arose through time by evolution from forms with different anatomical plans. How types of organisms arose and became distinct from one another is a central quest of evolutionary developmental biology. Our investigation of the interrelationships

沉默

Fossils of the Burgess Shaleambrian to the abundance of organisms alive today. The reinterpretation of the Burgess Shale fossils initiated by Simon Conway Morris and Harry Whittington in 1985 changed all that. Representatives of every phylum except the Bryozoa are found from Lower or Middle Cambrian rocks. Organisms currently

morale

Types and the Geoffroy—Cuvier Debates: A Crossroads in Evolutionary Morphologyorganisms and how groups of organisms could be united on the basis of common anatomical design: the Type (.),the Archetype, unity of type and unity of plan. Embryological criteria became increasingly important in this quest, but embryology too was typological. The eventual acceptance that all animal

古董

Embryological Archetypes and Homology: Establishing Evolutionary Embryologyn of this chapter, Von Baer played a pivotal role in this development. His ideas were rapidly assimilated into Britain as scientists there responded to the implications of the Geoffroy-Cuvier debate (s. 5.2). Richard Owen made a lasting impact when he separated homology from analogy (s. 5.3), and Da

Hyperplasia

,Constraints and Basic Phases of Developmenttruction, structure, form; ., plan, design, intention), which was introduced into morphology in 1945 by Joseph Henry Woodger (1894-1981). Although more or less assimilated into biology, the term has not been incorporated into general use outside of science, unlike terms such as ‘evolution’ and’ spec

Hyperplasia

Inheritance Systems: Zygotes, Maternal, Epigeneticlas, they are not. The problems must be intractable to have persisted unanswered for so long, and indeed, they are. In evaluating the state of knowledge of embryology some 80 years ago, Russell noted that development is one of the major and most difficult problems in biology. The situation has not c

PLUMP

協(xié)定

Spartan

Integrating Organ Systems, Developmental Canalization and Asymmetryr that particular tissue or organ. Although we know a great deal about inductive events for some tissues, organs and regions of individual embryos, we cannot yet produce a complete epigenetic blueprint for a single embryo. It is therefore important to identify further interactive cascades, to unders