Titlebook: Evolutionary Biology: Contemporary and Historical Reflections Upon Core Theory; Thomas E. Dickins,Benjamin J.A. Dickins Book 2023 The Edit

悄悄移動(dòng)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22028-9Evolutionary Theory; Evolutionary biology; Evolutionary Synthesis; Modern Synthesis; Standard Evolutiona

fixed-joint

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73656-8nary biology about the adequacy of what is sometimes termed standard evolutionary theory. These comments serve to introduce the aims of the book and we then summarize the chapters to follow, relating them to the opening themes.

MANIA

Human Rights as Liberatory Social Thought,s and scientists-turned-historians. History is important and how it is done has implications not only for our understanding of the emergence of a discipline but also for contemporary debates within it. This theme is followed with a detailed analysis of the often-partisan uses of history to define di

Overthrow

Inclusive Learning and Educational Equityynthesis (ES) as she prefers to call it. Her interesting contribution should hopefully increase awareness that the history of evolutionary biology is important even for researchers today who are mainly interested in solving practical questions of more immediate importance. Indeed, evolutionary biolo

無辜

Ethics and International Affairsry assigns a special role in this process to natural selection, with theorists invoking selection both to explain the appearance of purpose, and to predict what the purpose of adaptations will be. At the same time, traditional theory recognizes that many other factors might influence the evolution o

中國(guó)紀(jì)念碑

parallelism

David M. Vukadinovich,Susan L. Krinskynded Evolutionary Synthesis (EES) argues that evolutionary theory should not primarily explain certain evolutionary phenomena by highlighting genes and populations but organisms instead, in particular how their development and behavior biases and drives evolutionary change. Here, we offer a new hist

cylinder

BUOY

Edith Stein’s Concept of Soul Revisited biologists T. N. C. Vidya, Sutirth Dey, N. G. Prasad, and Amitabh Joshi press for making an explicit distinction between the . and?the . of selection, and further suggest that such a distinction weighs in the three explanatory roles ascribed to organisms in past and present evolutionary research th

摻和