找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evidence, Policy and Wellbeing; Ian Bache Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer N

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: bile-acids
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:44:44 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,ted nature of wellbeing. It also considers the significance of recent wellbeing initiatives internationally and nationally, including those in the devolved jurisdictions of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:20:16 | 只看該作者
Thu Trang Vu,Dung Vu,Thi Mai Lan Nguyenecent decades and different terms and concepts developed to capture this relationship. It then provides an overview of extant research on other What Works Centre policy areas that informed the research design for the empirical material collected for this book.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:52:36 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5591-9of the What Works Centre for Wellbeing in 2015. It then turns to the role of wellbeing in policy, providing examples of evidence on different drivers of wellbeing and on life satisfaction (a key indicator of SWB). The chapter concludes by drawing together some of the key themes and issues that inform subsequent chapters.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 18:45:42 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92536-3e of purposes. The findings suggest the need for a broad understanding of ‘what works’ beyond the rational-technical sense often employed to describe the work of What Works Centres and in the use of evidence more generally.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 22:06:26 | 只看該作者
Analytische und interpretative Grundlagenolerable costs, public acquiescence and receptivity among elected decision-makers. The findings indicate that while evidence may have obvious relevance to some criteria for survival than for others, it plays a role across all of the criteria—some of which are more closely related than previously acknowledged.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 04:05:05 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 05:25:03 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:36:21 | 只看該作者
,‘What Works’ for Wellbeing?,e of purposes. The findings suggest the need for a broad understanding of ‘what works’ beyond the rational-technical sense often employed to describe the work of What Works Centres and in the use of evidence more generally.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 13:48:39 | 只看該作者
Evidence in the Policy Stream: The Multiple Streams Approach,olerable costs, public acquiescence and receptivity among elected decision-makers. The findings indicate that while evidence may have obvious relevance to some criteria for survival than for others, it plays a role across all of the criteria—some of which are more closely related than previously acknowledged.
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 19:27:44 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 15:39
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
柏乡县| 饶阳县| 方正县| 张家口市| 耿马| 阜新市| 焉耆| 上虞市| 锡林郭勒盟| 瑞昌市| 富源县| 临泉县| 扬州市| 普陀区| 上栗县| 台南县| 日照市| 霍城县| 泰安市| 松江区| 高要市| 会泽县| 桦川县| 旬阳县| 酒泉市| 醴陵市| 繁峙县| 塔城市| 怀安县| 郑州市| 阜阳市| 高雄市| 凌海市| 丁青县| 宜昌市| 铁岭市| 上思县| 冀州市| 栾川县| 大荔县| 万荣县|