Titlebook: Everyday Friendships; Intimacy as Freedom Harry Blatterer Book 2015 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2015 Fr

果仁

The Love-Friendship Paradox and Cross-Sex Friendship,concile sex and friendship without partaking in the cultural staging of romance, but without having to forgo to generative potentials of intimacy. The reality of heteronormative barriers regarding what is ostensibly the ‘freest’ of all interpersonal relationships yields insights into the gendered di

安慰

,Conclusion: Friendship’s Embedded Freedom, delivers its basic conditions; it holds us and frees us in holding us. Without its hold we fall, while the exercise of power constricts it, strangling freedoms large and small. The kind of freedom friendship can deliver is the freedom to be yourself. Not despite others, but because of them. Not bec

說(shuō)不出

鎮(zhèn)痛劑

Tierische Gebarenslehre und Tierpsychologie,nking. Scholars have argued that this commonly reiterated interpretation misses the highly instrumental approach to intimacy taken by the Scots, and especially by Smith. I argue instead that early Romanticism is key to the meaning of intimacy in the modern sense; that the Romantics’ often exaggerate

語(yǔ)言學(xué)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62991-8 on the social scene whose behavior the scientist observes and tries to explain’ (Schutz, 1973, p. 6, my emphasis). Social scientists not only describe common words in their own terms, but also seek to understand the patterns of behaviors, practices, and attitudes they denote. Moreover, as Anthony G

ALOFT

Jan Korner,Helmut Lill,Christoph Jostenwould not be ourselves’ (Bollas cited in Craib, 1998, p. 10). These areas butt up against the disciplinary boundaries of sociology, and I certainly cannot pretend to have expertise in them. What I can do, however, is emphasize that our humanness cannot be divorced from our sociality. In this chapter

恃強(qiáng)凌弱的人

GNAT

Ji?í Chaloupka,Dominik Munzar,Josef Humlí?ekconcile sex and friendship without partaking in the cultural staging of romance, but without having to forgo to generative potentials of intimacy. The reality of heteronormative barriers regarding what is ostensibly the ‘freest’ of all interpersonal relationships yields insights into the gendered di

水獺

宴會(huì)

H. Robinsonbryogenesis. The genes for these structural RNAs are not characteristic of any tissue; they are genes controlling “housekeeping” products found in all cells and should be regulated differently from genes which are expressed in a single cell-type such as globin, immunoglobulin and silk fibroin genes.