找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences; Proceedings of the F H. Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker Conference proceedings

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 18848|回復(fù): 52
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:30:30 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences
副標(biāo)題Proceedings of the F
編輯H. Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317280/317280.mp4
圖書封面Titlebook: Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences; Proceedings of the F H. Tristram Engelhardt,Stuart F. Spicker Conference proceedings
描述This volume inaugurates a series concerning philosophy and medicine. There are few, if any, areas of social concern so pervasive as medicine and yet as underexamined by philosophy. But the claim to precedence of the Proceedings of the First Trans-Disciplinary Symposium on Philos- ophy and Medicine must be qualified. Claims to be "first" are notorious in the history of scientific as well as humanistic investigation and the claim that the First Trans-Disciplinary Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine has no precedent is not meant to be put in bald form. The editors clearly do not maintain that philosophers and physicians have not heretofore discussed matters of mutual concern, nor that individual philosophers and physicians have never taken up problems and concepts in medicine which are themselves at the boundary or interface of these two disciplines - concepts like "matter," "disease," "psyche. " Surely there have been books published on the logic and philosophy of medi- 1 cine. But the formalization of issues and concepts in medicine has not received, at least in this century, sustained interest by professional phi- losophers. Groups of philosophers have not engaged medicine in orde
出版日期Conference proceedings 19751st edition
關(guān)鍵詞Medical Ethics; ethics; health; morality; philosophy of medicine
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1769-5
isbn_softcover978-94-010-1771-8
isbn_ebook978-94-010-1769-5
copyrightD. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland 1975
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences被引頻次




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences年度引用




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences讀者反饋




書目名稱Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:11:10 | 只看該作者
Grundlegender theoretischer Bezugsrahmen,n the nature of the applications to which that knowledge is put, rather than in the knowledge itself? When, for instance, Claude Bernard published his great methodological treatise 109 years ago, and called it ., was this title appropriate or was it a misnomer? Should he have called it instead, say, .?
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:59:02 | 只看該作者
Energy and Exergy Efficiencies,e first the concept of health; second, the concept of disease; and third, I will draw some general conclusions concerning the interplay of evaluation and explanation in the concepts of health and disease.
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:58:47 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:07:13 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:12:01 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:28:06 | 只看該作者
and yet as underexamined by philosophy. But the claim to precedence of the Proceedings of the First Trans-Disciplinary Symposium on Philos- ophy and Medicine must be qualified. Claims to be "first" are notorious in the history of scientific as well as humanistic investigation and the claim that the
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:25:01 | 只看該作者
Effektivit?t in der Online-Kommunikationn he must be aware of something rough or uneven, something troublesome in the flow of experience. The explanation, when accepted, removes that rough spot and renders the flow of experience once more smooth.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:03:42 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:09:55 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1017-0d). Zaner clearly intends to speak to the issue of this Symposium in pointing out, in the text we just quoted, the role philosophy should play in the biomedical sciences. He is well aware that philosophy does not enter into this role out of a position of strength.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 10:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
伊吾县| 马边| 颍上县| 蒲江县| 普兰店市| 临邑县| 弥渡县| 交口县| 株洲县| 科技| 德令哈市| 敦煌市| 潮安县| 荥经县| 平顶山市| 黔西| 罗平县| 随州市| 巍山| 上饶县| 荃湾区| 于都县| 曲靖市| 佛学| 夏邑县| 陇南市| 泰兴市| 磴口县| 潮州市| 石渠县| 乌审旗| 黑河市| 上饶县| 武宁县| 华容县| 南康市| 阿巴嘎旗| 女性| 湟源县| 兴安县| 邹城市|