找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups; Eric van Um Book 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 Terrorism.Explanatory P

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 33411|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:43:32 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups
編輯Eric van Um
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317263/317263.mp4
概述Study in Political Science.Includes supplementary material:
圖書封面Titlebook: Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups;  Eric van Um Book 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016 Terrorism.Explanatory P
描述.This book improves our understanding of terrorists’ motivations and rationality and may, ultimately, also indicate how to respond to the phenomenon of terrorism. In his research studies, Eric van Um explores the political rationality of terrorist groups. The political rationality model builds on rational choice theory. It demands that terrorist groups take into account the costs and benefits of their available options and choose the option promising them the highest political utility. Testing the explanatory power of this model is relevant, as rational choice approaches have become very prominent in terrorism research. But, at the same time, their empirical power remains highly contested. Increased knowledge of the political rationality model not only promises added value for terrorism research itself, but also for social sciences more generally..
出版日期Book 2016
關(guān)鍵詞Terrorism; Explanatory Power; Rational Choice Theory; Inter-Group Violence; Terrorist Groups’ Political
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11539-5
isbn_softcover978-3-658-11538-8
isbn_ebook978-3-658-11539-5
copyrightSpringer Fachmedien Wiesbaden 2016
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups被引頻次




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups年度引用




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups讀者反饋




書目名稱Evaluating the Political Rationality of Terrorist Groups讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:15:34 | 只看該作者
Conceptual Considerations,ittle more than the fact that terrorism is difficult to define. As a consequence, more than 100, if not more than 200, modern definitions of terrorism have been formulated (Easson and Schmid, 2011). These emphasize different aspects of terrorism, such as the underlying motivations, applied tactics,
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:54:05 | 只看該作者
The Puzzle of Inter-Terrorist Group Violence,losion killed over 200 people, including many members of the terrorist group Palestine Liberation Front (PLF). The attack also destroyed equipment of the PLF, worth millions of dollars. It was widely acknowledged that the bombing had been carried out by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palest
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:57:18 | 只看該作者
The Puzzle of the Political Ineffectiveness of Terrorist Groups,ared an end to the group’s existence. This was the final act of a campaign of left-wing terrorism which had plagued Germany since the early 1970s. The terror attacks had created fear throughout the country, cost the lives of 34 people, and injured many more (Seils, 2008). The group’s campaign of vio
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:32:31 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:56:08 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0231-3is research has provided us with novel insights into many of the political, economic, social, and legal aspects and characteristics of terrorism. Other aspects, including the ever disputed definition of terrorism, have remained vague or unclear. The “rationality” of terrorists’ behavior also remains
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:24:51 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:58:32 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:39:53 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93827-7ared an end to the group’s existence. This was the final act of a campaign of left-wing terrorism which had plagued Germany since the early 1970s. The terror attacks had created fear throughout the country, cost the lives of 34 people, and injured many more (Seils, 2008). The group’s campaign of vio
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:22:45 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 14:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
榆林市| 和平县| 始兴县| 吴旗县| 驻马店市| 昌黎县| 天峨县| 永丰县| 怀安县| 贺州市| 南投市| 武穴市| 鹤峰县| 华安县| 保山市| 绥江县| 沁阳市| 来安县| 临安市| 左云县| 大连市| 东丽区| 伊宁县| 富民县| 上杭县| 磐安县| 门头沟区| 福贡县| 长汀县| 汉源县| 寿光市| 于田县| 德安县| 玛纳斯县| 临武县| 涪陵区| 城市| 蒙城县| 梓潼县| 织金县| 万源市|