找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluating the Language of Argument; Martin Hinton Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Argument Semantics.Fallacies of Language.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 48278|回復(fù): 47
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:35:02 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument
編輯Martin Hinton
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317261/317261.mp4
概述Explores the relationship between language and argumentation.Introduces informal argument semantics to the study of arguments.Features examples of the technique at work and its advantages
叢書名稱Argumentation Library
圖書封面Titlebook: Evaluating the Language of Argument;  Martin Hinton Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Argument Semantics.Fallacies of Language.
描述.This book is concerned with the evaluation of natural argumentative discourse, and, in particular, with the language in which arguments are expressed. It introduces a systematic procedure for the analysis and assessment of arguments, which is designed to be a practical tool, and may be considered a pseudo-algorithm for argument evaluation..The first half of the book lays the theoretical groundwork, with a thorough examination of both the nature of language and the nature of argument. This leads to a definition of argumentation as reasoning expressed within a procedure, which itself yields the three frames of analysis used in the evaluation procedure: Process, Reasoning, and Expression.?.The second half begins with a detailed discussion of the concept of fallacy, with particular attention on fallacies of language, their origin and their effects. A new way of looking at fallacies emerges from these chapters, and it is that conception, together with the understanding of the nature of argumentation described in earlier sections, which ultimately provides the support for the Comprehensive Assessment Procedure for Natural Argumentation..The first two levels of this innovative procedure
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Argument Semantics; Fallacies of Language; Linguistic Approaches to Argumentation; Nature of Language; N
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61694-6
isbn_softcover978-3-030-61696-0
isbn_ebook978-3-030-61694-6Series ISSN 1566-7650 Series E-ISSN 2215-1907
issn_series 1566-7650
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument被引頻次




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument年度引用




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument讀者反饋




書目名稱Evaluating the Language of Argument讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:11:33 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:06:47 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:53:09 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230522657In the introduction to their collection on Argumentation and Language, Oswald et al. cite three categories of research examining relations between linguistics and argumentation: the descriptive, explanatory, and semantic perspectives.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:06:59 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:34:03 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 21:05:45 | 只看該作者
General Conclusions and RecommendationsIn this, the final chapter, I take a number of examples of apparently argumentative texts and analyse then following the procedure I have described above. These cases have been chosen in order to illustrate how the procedure can be practically applied, and are not, therefore, being presented as, in any sense, a random sample of such texts.
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:57:50 | 只看該作者
The Modes of ArgumentationTraditionally, there are three fields which study arguments: logic, dialectic, and rhetoric. These were originally distinguished as much by the object of their study as by their varying concerns: logic dealt with reasoning, dialectic with discussion, and rhetoric with the making of speeches.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:52:11 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:56:45 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 05:28
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
张家口市| 香格里拉县| 齐齐哈尔市| 阿勒泰市| 得荣县| 静乐县| 南皮县| 铁岭县| 昔阳县| 衡阳市| 栾川县| 徐水县| 商洛市| 民和| 林甸县| 义乌市| 正镶白旗| 仙游县| 永新县| 德惠市| 佛坪县| 兴仁县| 德安县| 赣州市| 大安市| 望江县| 奉新县| 金湖县| 同江市| 科技| 凭祥市| 巴东县| 平湖市| 和政县| 永靖县| 云霄县| 巴林左旗| 长乐市| 甘德县| 新余市| 铜川市|