Titlebook: Evaluating Water Projects; Cost-Benefit Analysi Per-Olov Johansson,Bengt Kristr?m Book 2013 The Author(s) 2013 Electricity Generation.Gener

misperceive

書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects被引頻次




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects年度引用




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects讀者反饋




書目名稱Evaluating Water Projects讀者反饋學科排名

神秘

異端

perpetual

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8031-1egrating many complex issues. We use this framework to assess a proposal according to which water is diverted from electricity generation to the natural river channel (dryway) creating environmental and recreational benefits. The second study uses a very different approach to re-regulations of river

無底

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36790-8Electricity Generation; General Equilibrium Theory; Water Use Conflict; water quality and water polluti

草本植物

Per-Olov Johansson,Bengt Kristr?mCompares two approaches to handling natural resource conflicts.A brand-new approach to empirical assessment of re-regulations.Case of a hydropower plant in Sweden.Includes supplementary material:

草本植物

SpringerBriefs in Economicshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/317250.jpg

AVOW

Throttle

A Brief Comparison of the Approaches and an Outlook,s. The investigated proposal is designed so that virtually everybody is better off. At least this is the idea. This Win-Win approach is subjected to an empirical test. In this final chapter we briefly discuss the pros and cons of the two approaches and how they can be applied to other sharp conflicts about the use of scarce natural resources.

財政

English Education and the Liberal State,d lower bounds for WTP) that are selected by the respondent. The chapter then goes on to estimate the costs of the proposal. These are mainly the loss of profits by the hydropower company and externalities of coal-fired replacement power. A sensitivity analysis of the result of the cost-benefit analysis is undertaken.