找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications; Ellen-Marie Forsberg,Clare Shelley-Egan,Bjor

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 48412|回復(fù): 38
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:17:59 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications
編輯Ellen-Marie Forsberg,Clare Shelley-Egan,Bjorn Hofm
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/318/317211/317211.mp4
概述Includes supplementary material:
叢書(shū)名稱SpringerBriefs in Ethics
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications;  Ellen-Marie Forsberg,Clare Shelley-Egan,Bjor
描述This book offers the policy-maker or decision-maker key insights and practical information regarding the features of ethics frameworks best suited to the ethical assessment of human cognitive enhancement (HCE) applications, such as pharmaceutical cognitive enhancers and noninvasive brain stimulation techniques. This book takes as its departure point the entrenched philosophical debate between opponents and proponents of HCE and the increased feasibility of some applications of HCE. Recent calls for policy-making in the area of human enhancement reflect the need to find a balance between addressing current ethical issues and issues that are more speculative in nature or are underpinned by abstract philosophical concepts. Practical ethical approaches for policy or decision-making should enable the development of an evidence base for the risks and benefits of HCE applications. Moreover, such practical approaches should also incorporate a broader range of value bases that would facilitate convergence regarding certain decisions and judgements. This book identifies and evaluate tools that help us to go beyond polarised philosophical debates in order to assist practical decision makers i
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Human Enhancement; Human Cognitive Enhancement; Ethical Framework; Pharmaceutical Cognitive Enhancers; N
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53823-5
isbn_softcover978-3-319-53822-8
isbn_ebook978-3-319-53823-5Series ISSN 2211-8101 Series E-ISSN 2211-811X
issn_series 2211-8101
copyrightThe Author(s) 2017
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Evaluating Ethical Frameworks for the Assessment of Human Cognitive Enhancement Applications讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:53:57 | 只看該作者
Ethical Concerns in HCE: The Examples of Cognitive Enhancing Drugs and Noninvasive Brain Stimulatioh, followed by the addition of references found in the literature identified in this search. We will here first present the two applications (or rather, areas of applications) that we focused on in our literature search. Then we will go through the main ethical issues that we identified in the searc
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 03:04:22 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:49:44 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:12:58 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:27:27 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:53:25 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:35:57 | 只看該作者
Preface to the Oslo Channel Model,In the previous section, we have seen that there are several ethical frameworks that can be used to assess HCE applications and in Chap. 3 we reviewed the general ethical issues raised by HCE applications. We are now in a position to discuss which of the six above mentioned frameworks seem to fit best for assessing HCE applications.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:51:01 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:16:17 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 06:12
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
柘城县| 玉屏| 定安县| 永春县| 万荣县| 天祝| 灌南县| 郧西县| 措美县| 江口县| 集安市| 湾仔区| 体育| 锡林郭勒盟| 五莲县| 高要市| 林州市| 赣州市| 安庆市| 齐齐哈尔市| 洪泽县| 青海省| 林周县| 平顺县| 南投市| 筠连县| 内黄县| 克什克腾旗| 汝南县| 天水市| 睢宁县| 公安县| 六枝特区| 杭州市| 沙河市| 伊金霍洛旗| 桑日县| 花莲县| 万安县| 田林县| 天长市|