Titlebook: Eva Picardi on Language, Analysis and History; Annalisa Coliva,Paolo Leonardi,Sebastiano Moruzzi Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

ARCH

DNR215

護(hù)身符

不規(guī)則的跳動(dòng)

https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28150-9f her arguments, endorsing Eva’s criticism of Williamson’s analysis of Dummett and developing a suggestion by Manuel García-Carpintero on a speech act analysis of pejoratives. Eva’s main concern is accounting for our instinctive refusal to endorse an assertion containing pejoratives because it sugge

遺棄

evaculate

宮殿般

營(yíng)養(yǎng)

commune

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28920-5ect her identification of Chomsky’s notion of “tacit knowledge” of language with Dummett’s notion of implicit knowledge, and I argue that Eva’s (and Dummett’s) criticism of the latter notion does not apply to the former. In the second part of the paper, I take Eva’s side in criticizing individualism

香料

J. H. Lawton,J. R. Beddington,R. BonserStanley and Williamson and finds them wanting. Afterwards, it presents Chomsky’s position on linguistic competence as a form of propositional knowledge. It criticizes both the theoretical and the empirical arguments Chomsky puts forward in favor of his view and presents some observations in favor of