Titlebook: European Union Contested; Foreign Policy in a Elisabeth Johansson-Nogués,Martijn C. Vlaskamp,Est Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

多嘴多舌

Book 2020amental norms, organizing principles and standardized procedures in relation to the abolition of the death penalty, climate, Responsibility to Protect, peacebuilding, natural resource governance,?the International Criminal Court, lethal autonomous weapons systems, trade,?the security-development nex

簡略

Alveolar-Bone

Theory of Distance-Regular Graphs,promise-building approach to promote its own (re)interpretation of CBDR. Faced with hard contestation by developing countries, the EU engaged in a less hardline discourse than some of the other developed countries. This bridge-building positioning positively affected the EU’s perceived legitimacy in

addition

Máximo Trench,Ricardo A. Minervinorect modes of contestation, such as ‘silent contestation’. As a result, the European Union has not been receptive to India’s critique. This is amplified, as the EU has developed its perspective on local ownership among like-minded countries, within the OECD-DAC context and hence relies on internal l

Irrigate

Distant Hybridization of Crop Plantsapter argues that these contestations remained predominantly soft and did not affect the legitimacy of the organizing principle too much. None of the contesters openly challenged the principle of transparency, but they rather tried to reduce its importance or to change the standardized procedures th

色情

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5001-0actors in the international system. In this chapter, we focus on the relationship between the internal and external levels and ask how the EU has reacted to external contestation of the ICC. ?Can the EU rally behind a common position or does external contestation promote internal differences?

誹謗

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90081-0ational organizations deliberation as a mode of contestation was dominant and resulted in a soft contestation of the emerging norm. As a result, the EU at the international level-triggered norm followership, where its fundamental norms and values of EU foreign policy proved to be resilient, while at

Myocyte

Distinction, Exclusivity and Whitenessly became salient when investor protection provisions in TTIP were also linked to CETA. As the chapter explains, while the EU still deems the promotion of free trade to be a fundamental norm, it has changed some of its standardized procedures and regulations on trade in response to intra-European op

相反放置

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20197-9 capacity purposes. Drawing on interviews with EU representatives and relevant documents, the chapter analyses this contestation as well as the impact on EU’s legitimacy and authority. It shows that there is significant overlap between ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ contestation and that while the contestation i

關(guān)節(jié)炎