Titlebook: European Sports Law; Collected Papers Stephen Weatherill Book 2014Latest edition T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the au

FLIC

European Football Law,tball. Although, on one level, this ‘only’ concerns football, the ruling has major economic implications for sport generally. . is also of significance in the development of aspects of Community trade law. More generally, the saga offers an insight into the capacity of EC law to supply the individua

optic-nerve

Annotation [, Case],ropean Court. Bosman’s legal success will change football in particular and sport in general, but the ruling is also of major significance in the evolution of EC law. The purpose of this annotation is to explore the significance of the judgment to the general development of the EC legal order, and t

indecipherable

0033149875354: Fining the Organisers of the 1998 Football World Cup,finding that the organising committee for the tournament had violated Article 82 of the EC Treaty and Article 54 of the EEA agreement by applying discriminatory arrangements to the sale of tickets to the general public. A fine of € 1000 was imposed. The purpose of this article is to consider why the

鞠躬

Sports Under EC Competition Law and US Antitrust Law,ance for sports lawyers, but it is also intriguing to the specialist in EC trade law and in competition/antitrust law. Sport is . immunised from the supervision of EC law and neither is it simply another industry that must abide by the requirements of the EC legal order. Sport is a special case, but

dandruff

The Helsinki Report on Sport,hat month’s European Council held in Helsinki. The purpose of this note is to examine the key features of the Report and to show the direction in which EC policy on sport is likely to move in future. In order to achieve this, it is first necessary to sketch the history of EC involvement in sport, be

花束

,Resisting the Pressures of ‘Americanization’: The Influence of European Community Law on the ‘Europ generated incentives to litigate. This in turn prompts questions about the extent to which the business of sport is properly treated as special and deserving of full or partial immunity from the application of normal legal rules. The European Community (EC) legal order is no different from others i

背帶

chlorosis

溝通

Is the Pyramid Compatible with EC Law?,t in Europe gives sporting federations a practical monopoly. The existence of several federations in one discipline would risk causing major conflicts?’. Indeed it would create such a risk. It is not the purpose of this short paper to argue a case in favour of an injection of competition into the jo

咒語(yǔ)

The Sale of Rights to Broadcast Sporting Events Under EC Law,derpinning that market, the EC Treaty does not provide for this. Article 5(1) EC declares that ‘The Community shall act within the limits of the powers conferred upon it by this Treaty and of the objectives assigned to it therein.’ This is commonly referred to as the principle of ‘a(chǎn)ttributed compete