Titlebook: European Sexual Citizenship; Human Rights, Bodies Francesca Romana Ammaturo Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017

雪上輕舟飛過

Subjugate

繼而發(fā)生

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-699-1igious, political and cultural allegiances in order to make human rights claims as an active agent, rather than a passive recipient of protection on the part of a national or supranational politico-legal authority.

FLIC

Introduction,European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) on sexual orientation and gender identity, this books seeks to explore the ways in which LGBTQI persons, and the recognition of their rights claims, are at the core of the process by which a “European identity” and a “European Citizenship” is relentlessly sought and defined.

Legion

幻影

peak-flow

Introduction,tionships underpinning the creation and circulation of the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and intersex (LGBTQI) citizen and rights-holder in the European continent, defined not by the narrow borders of the European Union, but as an . entity and . space of belonging. By combining a Foucau

SIT

Gender, Sexuality and Human Rights: A European Perspective,may or may not differ from the American model of human rights advocacy. The chapter highlights the peculiarity of the “European Model” of protection of LGBTQI persons as being influenced by the presence of both the EU and the CoE. Further, the chapter illustrates how developments in the field of hum

enchant

Sexual Citizenship: From Social Inclusion to Political Contestation,entities intersect. While the chapter highlights the intrinsic tension existing between citizenship and human rights, it also considers emerging models of non-national citizenship in the context of Europe as a unique opportunity to rethink exclusionary practices in the allocation of political member

caldron

,“The Pink Agenda ”: The Challenges of Promoting Queer-Friendly Policies Abroad,ext of Eastern Europe, as well as claims of LGBTQI asylum-seekers in Europe, this chapter analyses the way in which a geography of queer-friendly versus homo- and transphobic member states of the CoE is created in the case law of the ECtHR. The chapter employs the term “Pink Agenda” to indicate the