找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: European Philosophy of Science - Philosophy of Science in Europe and the Viennese Heritage; Maria Carla Galavotti,Elisabeth Nemeth,Friedri

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: ACE313
51#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 11:29:28 | 只看該作者
Martin A. Ciesielski,Thomas SchutzSome philosophers of biology argue that laws or principles in biology are nonempirical, but a priori or analytical, mentioning the Hardy-Weinberg law as an example.
52#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 13:02:11 | 只看該作者
Digitale Führungsintelligenz: "Adapt to win"In 1930 Otto Neurath asked Alfred Tarski for information about Polish philosophers of science and their work. Tarski answered on 24 April, 1930, saying in one of the first sentences (see Tarski 1992, p. 31) that:
53#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-30 19:19:33 | 只看該作者
54#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 00:17:50 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55622-7In this paper I am going to examine Kelsen’s legal positivism in the light of Nazilegal theory. My claim will be that Kelsen’s thesis that law and morality constitute two distinct normative spheres is highly plausible, but that some of his metaethical assumptions are seriously flawed.
55#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 02:13:43 | 只看該作者
Folgen auf Ebene der Finanzverwaltung,The program of logical positivism gave inspiration to the unity of science movement. The movement carried the belief that all sciences, including the social sciences and the humanities, ought to share some common language if these disciplines were to be considered genuine sciences (.).
56#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 08:19:41 | 只看該作者
57#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 12:14:16 | 只看該作者
Kazimierz Twardowski and the Development of Philosophy of Science in Poland,In 1930 Otto Neurath asked Alfred Tarski for information about Polish philosophers of science and their work. Tarski answered on 24 April, 1930, saying in one of the first sentences (see Tarski 1992, p. 31) that:
58#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 13:44:04 | 只看該作者
59#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 18:48:35 | 只看該作者
,Kelsen’s Legal Positivism and the Challenge of Nazi Law,In this paper I am going to examine Kelsen’s legal positivism in the light of Nazilegal theory. My claim will be that Kelsen’s thesis that law and morality constitute two distinct normative spheres is highly plausible, but that some of his metaethical assumptions are seriously flawed.
60#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-31 21:54:20 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-13 02:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
中宁县| 肃宁县| 五指山市| 鄢陵县| 休宁县| 常德市| 宜阳县| 朝阳县| 铁岭市| 安达市| 池州市| 察雅县| 罗平县| 嘉黎县| 芷江| 吉安县| 普洱| 潼南县| 遂宁市| 肃宁县| 鹤峰县| 丹江口市| 军事| 海阳市| 平乐县| 和硕县| 泸水县| 周至县| 桂东县| 白山市| 磐石市| 东方市| 南昌市| 贵州省| 望谟县| 汕尾市| 信宜市| 绥芬河市| 中西区| 冕宁县| 都昌县|