找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: European Dispute over the Concept of Man; A Study in Political Micha? Gierycz Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Morality debate

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 18192|回復(fù): 46
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 17:22:30 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man
副標(biāo)題A Study in Political
編輯Micha? Gierycz
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/317/316767/316767.mp4
概述Describes current trends in the European Union‘s morality policy.Analyses current value debates from an anthropological perspective.Expands understanding of political anthropology within political sci
叢書名稱Contributions to Political Science
圖書封面Titlebook: European Dispute over the Concept of Man; A Study in Political Micha? Gierycz Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Morality debate
描述The book represents original research in a field of study rarely pursued while analysing the intellectual dimensions of disputes over ethically sensitive issues that occur in European Union politics. These disputes are generally analysed at ideological, ethical, economic and interstate levels. However, these references do not suffice in understanding the issue, which is related to a divergent perception of the essence of humanity and thus the subject matter of anthropology. The main research objective of the monograph is therefore to reconstruct the sources and the specific European Union way of thinking about the human being.?Methodologically, the book expands the understanding of political anthropology?within political science and?presents a range of suitable instruments for pursuing anthropological research. At the theoretical level, it proposes an anthropological typology of the main currents of European political thought and reveals their prominence for the anthropological orientation of the EU‘s axiology. Empirically, it provides an?analysis of the anthropological?features?of European Union institutions and policies in addition to discussing the relation between the axiologic
出版日期Book 2021
關(guān)鍵詞Morality debates in the European Union; Human rights, women‘s rights and LGBT rights; Religious vs; se
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61520-8
isbn_softcover978-3-030-61522-2
isbn_ebook978-3-030-61520-8Series ISSN 2198-7289 Series E-ISSN 2198-7297
issn_series 2198-7289
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2021
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man被引頻次




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man年度引用




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man讀者反饋




書目名稱European Dispute over the Concept of Man讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:50:42 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,s is of course not finished.” The recent years of the European Union have been marked by “spectacular” crises: economic, migration, epidemic and political ones, the most obvious manifestation of which is the United Kingdom’s decision to leave the EU. Nevertheless, Europe has long been suffering from
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:01:05 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:06:10 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:42:33 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:56:51 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:20:53 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:09:56 | 只看該作者
Unconstrained Anthropologyached by Sowell, which—or so it seems—has resulted, among other things, in cutting Marxism from the main current of unconstrained politics, we should ask about the core vision of man characteristic of unconstrained politics. When seeking an answer to this question, we must begin with the works of ei
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:34:50 | 只看該作者
The Anthropology of Late Modernityake us forget what these two perspectives have in common. To identify their shared area, let us refer to the understanding of the role of philosophers which the two adversaries subscribe to. In order to avoid shortcuts, let us refer to eighteenth-century claims made by Johann Gottlieb Fichte, who sa
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:05:08 | 只看該作者
Around Morality Policyions, pornography, prostitution, drugs.” This list is not exhaustive, however. Other authors consider the “obvious” issues to include problems related to assisted reproduction, stem-cell research, capital punishment, religion, assisted suicide, publicly subsidized art, sexual education, prayer at sc
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-22 23:51
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
科技| 舞钢市| 沧源| 扶风县| 柘城县| 渭南市| 弋阳县| 封丘县| 福州市| 烟台市| 罗田县| 西贡区| 平乡县| 孙吴县| 安岳县| 富阳市| 岳普湖县| 凤城市| 松滋市| 榆中县| 西青区| 吉隆县| 安达市| 台南市| 吴川市| 溧阳市| 建平县| 望谟县| 和平县| 长阳| 罗田县| 尼玛县| 新民市| 曲水县| 合作市| 大洼县| 梁山县| 池州市| 平原县| 陆川县| 高雄县|