Titlebook: European Cosmopolitanism in Question; Roland Robertson,Anne Sophie Krossa Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

commotion

書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question被引頻次




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question年度引用




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question年度引用學科排名




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question讀者反饋




書目名稱European Cosmopolitanism in Question讀者反饋學科排名

四目在模仿

Cosmopolitanism As a Concept for Tolerant Demarcation,ition of otherness to a maxim, a concealed excessive increase of universalism is at work. What gets lost on the way is the recursive capacity of cosmopolitanism to recognize the justifiable difference of the Other, and to require a distinct collective identity. Only such self-restraint makes possibl

Immunotherapy

Cosmopolitan Liberalism and Its Limits, shape their distribution and use. There is a tension running through modern history between struggles to open new individual opportunities — for those with the resources to take them up — and struggles to transform social structures to benefit those much less well off. Both of these struggles are i

轉(zhuǎn)換

The Obama Effect: Confronting the Political and the Cosmopolitics of the Real,embattled (Robbins, 1998; R. Werbner, 2008). Cosmopolitans are actors in a highly contested political field. Moreover, as I have argued recently (P. Werbner, 2008), cosmopolitanism is not restricted to the West. In the developing world both elites and non-elites may foster cosmopolitan visions, and

有抱負者

雄偉

Divided Time: Notes on Cosmopolitanism and the Theory of Second Modernity,

雄偉

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-36975-3upon (Benhabib, 2004; Bohman, 2007; Habermas, 2006). Cosmopolitan social science — or, more pertinently for this chapter, cosmopolitan social theory — is now a rightful occupant of our increasingly cosmopolitan intellectual landscapes.

Abbreviate

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48548-0ition of otherness to a maxim, a concealed excessive increase of universalism is at work. What gets lost on the way is the recursive capacity of cosmopolitanism to recognize the justifiable difference of the Other, and to require a distinct collective identity. Only such self-restraint makes possibl

nettle

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-05096-4 shape their distribution and use. There is a tension running through modern history between struggles to open new individual opportunities — for those with the resources to take them up — and struggles to transform social structures to benefit those much less well off. Both of these struggles are i

scotoma