Titlebook: Europe 1945–1990s; The End of an Era? Antonio Varsori (Associate Professor of History of Book 1995 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmil

Harding

書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s被引頻次




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s年度引用




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s讀者反饋




書目名稱Europe 1945–1990s讀者反饋學科排名

雕鏤

Peter Buchenau,Alexander Hofmanne exclusion of the German SED, and with the less explicable exclusion of the Albanian CP, plus the French and Italian CPs). In short, the phase of co-operation, spanning the period during the latter stages of, and immediately after, the war, coincided with the absence of any centralized internationa

生氣地

無禮回復

Stephan Schr?lkamp,Wilfried Breyvogel battles and regime changes came to an end, the post-Vienna equilibrium accommodated the industrialization of Western Europe and the renewed advent of middle-class political participants. A generation later the revolutions of 1848 and the national movements in their aftermath buffeted the Vienna set

過份艷麗

Amylase

Amylase

USSR and Soviet Bloc between Ideology and Realpolitik (1947–58)mpered efforts aimed at elucidating key aspects of the balance of forces and relations not only between the States of the ‘Soviet bloc’, but also between the Communist Parties in power. Yet State and Party constitute, in our case, interactive forces of crucial importance and, consequently, essential

anachronistic

The Presence of the Superpowers in Europe (1947–54): An Overview battles and regime changes came to an end, the post-Vienna equilibrium accommodated the industrialization of Western Europe and the renewed advent of middle-class political participants. A generation later the revolutions of 1848 and the national movements in their aftermath buffeted the Vienna set

Anhydrous

Working-Memory

Some Reflections on Post-World War II Peace-Making Practices (1947–51)in the art of making peace had come about after 1945, but there was very little in the historiography to suggest why, how and when this change took place. In particular the crucial passage from war-time peace thinking to post-war practice of pacification had not been fully explored by diplomatic historians.