Titlebook: Eurasian Borderlands; Spatializing Borders Tone Bringa,Hege Toje Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Comparative

山羊

Book 2016ers in the making, as well as physically demarcated international stateborders. This book also pays attention to both the spatial and temporalaspects of borders and the interplay between boundaries and borders over timeand thus identifies some of the processes at play as space is territorializedin Eurasia in the aftermath of state collapse..

BILK

Marktmikrostrukturtheorie und Experimente,tacts by the use of formal and informal channels. The main domains of cross-border contact and movements are trade-vending relations, healthcare, smuggling and kin relations. The chapter argues that the multiple forms of relationships create a possibility of overcoming the conflict in spite of increasing pressures from competing citizen regimes.

節(jié)省

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04232-5ty. We can explore the historical shifts in Karakol’s position as a borderland town, looking at both its actual political and economic position, and its position as conceptualized by those who live there.

Coma704

,“Dead End”: A Spatial History of a Border Town in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan,ty. We can explore the historical shifts in Karakol’s position as a borderland town, looking at both its actual political and economic position, and its position as conceptualized by those who live there.

FEAT

開始從未

Introduction: Eurasian Borderlands,ng and “border work” is not only about states’ physical marking of territory and claims to sovereignty but about people’s, particularly borderlanders’, spatial practices over time. In order to illustrate how borders come about, are maintained and contested, we look at border communities at both inte

污點

,Post-Soviet or Eurasian Lands? Rethinking Analytic Categories in the Ukraine–EU and Russia–China Bocertain family resemblances. More recently, influential work in political theory views contemporary borders across the globe as expressing a common experience of waning state sovereignty. But do these taxonomical and theoretical constructs, and their underlying assumptions, reflect the work that bor

輕而薄

,“Dead End”: A Spatial History of a Border Town in Post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan,China and Kazakhstan. It contributes to the debates on the construction and perception of geographical landscapes, and the local populations’ accommodation to imperial and international borders at different moments in history (Bassin, Mark. 1991. Russia between Europe and Asia: The Ideological Const