Titlebook: Ethics, Society and Politics: Themes from the Philosophy of Peter Winch; Michael Campbell,Lynette Reid Book 2020 The Editor(s) (if applica

Trabeculoplasty

大方不好

,The Identity of Man?– Winch Between Spinoza, Weil, and Wittgenstein,rences on a diverse range of issues in his works, but also by several lectures and seminars he delivered on this thinker. A reconstruction of his interpretation of Spinoza’s system, which unites epistemological, metaphysical and ethical considerations as mutually dependent, brings to the fore Winch’

卷發(fā)

,Weil and Wittgenstein in Winch’s “Reading”: Philosophy as a Way of Life,ncepts developed independently by Wittgenstein. The comparative analysis illustrates that for both these Socratic philosophers, theory corresponds to daily experience, a real “way of life” which in itself gives rise to an ethical-philosophical pragmatics that informs the most intimate ontological di

POLYP

Binge-Drinking

,Between Discovery and Decision: Winch’s Critique of the Universalizability of Moral Judgment Revisin superseded, in fact, on closer examination it presents a viewpoint which is missing from modern mainstream metaethics. I will first review Winch’s criticism of the universalizability thesis, then examine some responses to that criticism. Finally, I will reconsider Winch’s proposals from a differen

身心疲憊

,The Good and Bad in Sexual Relations: A Reconsideration of Winch’s Limiting Notions,death, are not to be considered as events or experiences in the world, but rather as having a more fundamental role in shaping what we make sense of as human life and morality. In this article, I discuss some senses in which sexual relations, perceived as such a “l(fā)imiting notion”, can be said to “de

無禮回復(fù)

Winch on First Philosophy: Unity and Multiplicity,ganizer(s), that there might be scientifically determinable foundations for a universal human morality. “I do not know exactly how Professor Schn?delbach himself conceives this matter”, he concedes. But Winch’s preferred model, if you will permit me something obvious, is “[T]hese phenomena have no o