找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery; Marike L. D. Broekman Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Surgical innovation.Research eth

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 51291|回復(fù): 55
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:49:11 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery
編輯Marike L. D. Broekman
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/317/316091/316091.mp4
概述Focuses on ethical issues relevant to innovation in neurosurgery.Provides a guide to the ethical introduction of novel devices and procedures in neurosurgery.Discusses innovative treatments from stem
圖書封面Titlebook: Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery;  Marike L. D. Broekman Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019 Surgical innovation.Research eth
描述.This book covers all ethical aspects of introducing novel implants and procedures in neurosurgery in a structured way, addressing the current knowledge gap concerning ethical innovations in neurosurgery. Initially it explores the difficulties involved in defining when a procedure should be considered innovation, research, or care. To this end, it presents not only an overview of current literature, but also data from a recent survey among neurosurgeons in Europe..The book subsequently discusses the ethical issues related to innovation. These include: informed consent (what should a surgeon tell the patient and how should he/she do so), oversight (can any surgeon simply implant a novel spinal device?), the learning curve (when should a surgeon be allowed to perform a novel procedure?), vulnerable patients (how to innovate in the pediatric population or in an emergency setting), and conflicts of interest, as well as the ethics of paying for innovative treatments...In turn, the closing chapters focus on the evaluation of neurosurgical research and innovation. Are cultural changes necessary and how could innovation benefit from (international) collaborations? Given the range of topics
出版日期Book 2019
關(guān)鍵詞Surgical innovation; Research ethics; Innovative treatments; Clinical translation; Learning health care
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05502-8
isbn_ebook978-3-030-05502-8
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery被引頻次




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery年度引用




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery讀者反饋




書目名稱Ethics of Innovation in Neurosurgery讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:01:36 | 只看該作者
David H. Woodmansee,Andreas Pfaltzpies, and alternative treatments may be limited. Furthermore, for disease processes affecting information processing or the ability to participate in high-level cognitive decision-making, an individual’s capacity to partake in informed consent may be hindered. At present, there is limited guidance f
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:19:59 | 只看該作者
Advances in Information Securityrictly safeguarded by the physician and the parents..Children participating in innovative neurosurgical procedures represent a particularly vulnerable patient population, as they may commonly lack decisional capability, may show differential behavior toward adults, and may suffer from acute conditio
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:05:44 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:35:08 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21054-1medical innovation is funded. Among these topics are the potential pressures for positive results in privately funded research, the difference in which sources fund basic versus translational research, and the possibility of conflicts of industry in physician-corporate collaborations. Although there
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:58:52 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230277229sues that arise in innovative treatments. Ultimately, it makes most sense to enlist the aid of clinical ethics committees to perform organizational ethics consultations, and an open line of communication between surgeons, hospital administrators, and ethics committees should be nurtured in order to
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:15:17 | 只看該作者
Iris Murdoch: Texts and Contextsse. The significant degree of consensus in the current ethical literature, the broader empirical evidence supporting the discussed concerns, and the parallels with ethical topics, solutions, and regulations in other medical and nonmedical fields can guide the construction of an ethical framework tha
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:53:30 | 只看該作者
Iris Murdoch’s Practical Metaphysics we aim to apply these principles to a neurosurgical problem that has recently gained widespread media attention. Recently, head transplant has gained attention as neurosurgeons have proposed performing this procedure on a human in the near future. By critically evaluating this proposed procedure vi
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:00:56 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:36:36 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-21 21:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
正阳县| 车险| 铜川市| 文水县| 莱西市| 桐城市| 本溪| 彭州市| 昂仁县| 错那县| 台东县| 萨嘎县| 广水市| 胶南市| 清河县| 龙岩市| 衡南县| 扎囊县| 奉节县| 高密市| 枣庄市| 阳原县| 陆良县| 阳江市| 巴马| 德保县| 安徽省| 清水县| 革吉县| 科技| 靖安县| 丹巴县| 彭水| 盐池县| 德惠市| 翼城县| 辰溪县| 西安市| 富宁县| 聂拉木县| 会理县|