Titlebook: Ethics for Social Impact; Ethical Decision-Mak Femida Handy,Allison R. Russell Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

Monocle

stress-response

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75040-8Nonprofit organization; business ethics; stakeholders; bottom lines; code of ethics; charities; governance

Gene408

偽書

foodstuff

APNEA

Immunization

Making Ethics Part of Practice: Developing a Code of Ethicsideas may seem very abstract, or perhaps like “ideal” cases for living when, in actuality, real life is much messier and more complex. For example, most of our students point out that it is all well and good for Kant to write about the “categorical imperative,” but they are reluctant to apply his lo

瑣事

A Road Map for Ethical Decision-Makingcal dilemmas. The case introduces the issue of donor intent and asks whether or not it is appropriate to acquiesce to donor demands, even if it means compromising organizational policies. Handy and Russell follow the road map for ethical decision-making introduced in this chapter to weigh the altern

符合你規(guī)定

Case 1: Tainted Money?” Through this case, Handy and Russell push readers to tackle the age-old question of whether charities can clean dirty money, or whether they should avoid donations of money made through potentially unethical means. Discussion questions challenge readers to look at this question from new perspecti

態(tài)度暖昧

Case 2: Strings Attached members in this case, which deals with how to prioritize competing interests of different stakeholders. Handy and Russell directly address the fundamental nature of nonprofit organizations—multiple stakeholders, multiple bottom lines—that they first introduced in Chapter .. They ask readers to thin