找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ethics and Taxation; Robert F. van Brederode Book 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 taxation.ethics.law and morality.tax fraud.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Autopsy
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:45:14 | 只看該作者
Introduction: Why Ethics Matter in Taxation,ation to pay and the morality of tax avoidance and planning, voluntary compliance, and tax law enforcement and its ethical challenges. It provides context to the individual chapters, places footnotes by positions taken and shows alternative perspectives.
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:44:06 | 只看該作者
Ethical Standards for Tax Adviserschapter notes signs of a divergence (without concluding that there has been complete separation) of ethics between tax advisers in the legal profession and others. In the course of doing so the chapter identifies the key responsibilities borne by tax advisers to their clients and to society.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:32:25 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:36:19 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:39:41 | 只看該作者
Introduction to Protein Crystallization,ile each type of taxation has a presence, the advocacy of progressive taxation as a means of serving the least-off members of society and promoting social equality and opportunity is a leitmotif of the biblically informed religious traditions.
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:50:57 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:05:15 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:16:30 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:09:25 | 只看該作者
Social Contract and Beyond: Sociability, Reciprocity and Tax Ethicsxes has become an exclusively legal affair: a legal obligation towards the state, replacing a moral obligation towards society. This chapter tries to find an answer to that question by analysing social contract theorists and their critics. Social contract theorists and their critics searched for pri
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:21:11 | 只看該作者
Libertarian Perspectives on the Ethics of Taxationthose which have exerted a strong influence both on libertarianism, popular and academic, and on political and ethical discourse more broadly. Our discussion centers on the work of three prominent libertarians: Robert Nozick, Ayn Rand, and Murray Rothbard. For each, we present his or her position co
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 04:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
鸡泽县| 南康市| 宝山区| 辽宁省| 江山市| 普格县| 锡林郭勒盟| 甘孜县| 沙湾县| 柏乡县| 措勤县| 儋州市| 稻城县| 博爱县| 防城港市| 乃东县| 景德镇市| 宿松县| 太白县| 遂宁市| 庄河市| 丹凤县| 茂名市| 句容市| 合水县| 曲沃县| 花莲县| 若羌县| 临城县| 奉节县| 吴桥县| 乡城县| 盐亭县| 冷水江市| 金堂县| 稷山县| 林州市| 昌吉市| 芮城县| 三门县| 潜江市|