找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ethics and Taxation; Robert F. van Brederode Book 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020 taxation.ethics.law and morality.tax fraud.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Autopsy
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:45:14 | 只看該作者
Introduction: Why Ethics Matter in Taxation,ation to pay and the morality of tax avoidance and planning, voluntary compliance, and tax law enforcement and its ethical challenges. It provides context to the individual chapters, places footnotes by positions taken and shows alternative perspectives.
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:44:06 | 只看該作者
Ethical Standards for Tax Adviserschapter notes signs of a divergence (without concluding that there has been complete separation) of ethics between tax advisers in the legal profession and others. In the course of doing so the chapter identifies the key responsibilities borne by tax advisers to their clients and to society.
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 06:32:25 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:36:19 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:39:41 | 只看該作者
Introduction to Protein Crystallization,ile each type of taxation has a presence, the advocacy of progressive taxation as a means of serving the least-off members of society and promoting social equality and opportunity is a leitmotif of the biblically informed religious traditions.
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:50:57 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 01:05:15 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:16:30 | 只看該作者
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 08:09:25 | 只看該作者
Social Contract and Beyond: Sociability, Reciprocity and Tax Ethicsxes has become an exclusively legal affair: a legal obligation towards the state, replacing a moral obligation towards society. This chapter tries to find an answer to that question by analysing social contract theorists and their critics. Social contract theorists and their critics searched for pri
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:21:11 | 只看該作者
Libertarian Perspectives on the Ethics of Taxationthose which have exerted a strong influence both on libertarianism, popular and academic, and on political and ethical discourse more broadly. Our discussion centers on the work of three prominent libertarians: Robert Nozick, Ayn Rand, and Murray Rothbard. For each, we present his or her position co
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-23 04:57
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
宜城市| 石景山区| 宁波市| 杨浦区| 丹寨县| 双江| 巴林右旗| 宜阳县| 萝北县| 肃南| 津市市| 鹤壁市| 盖州市| 望都县| 宜川县| 宁国市| 东丽区| 邛崃市| 陵水| 连江县| 花莲县| 舞钢市| 申扎县| 介休市| 衡阳市| 华池县| 松原市| 黄梅县| 特克斯县| 潮州市| 崇信县| 阜平县| 湘乡市| 桃江县| 贺州市| 芒康县| 盐池县| 松江区| 青田县| 乐业县| 樟树市|