Titlebook: Ethical Issues in Behavioral Neuroscience; Grace Lee,Judy Illes,Frauke Ohl Book 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Behavior.Ethic

Mirage

New Insights into Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis,sponsibly started, and once started adequately protect the interests of participants. We conclude with recommendations that industry sponsors of clinical trials should adopt in order to advance a collective and patient-centered research ethic.

沒(méi)花的是打擾

Would the Elimination of the Capacity to Suffer Solve Ethical Dilemmas in Experimental Animal Reseaecent knockout experiments suggest that we already have, or are very close to having, the capacity to reduce suffering in laboratories via genetic engineering. If we are truly committed to balancing the advancement of science with the welfare of animals, this option should be further explored.

Felicitous

How Does Enhancing Cognition Affect Human Values? How Does This Translate into Social Responsibilitlikely to be undertaken. This paper explores the way values affect and are affected by enhancing cognitive abilities. Furthermore, it argues that knowledge of the interplay between values and cognitive enhancement makes a strong case for social responsibility around cognitive enhancement practices.

情愛(ài)

平息

Externalization of Consciousness. Scientific Possibilities and Clinical Implications,ormed consent. Against this background, we argue for the necessity of further scientific efforts and ethical reflection in neurotechnological assessment of consciousness and ‘cerebral communication’ with verbally non-communicative patients.

agonist

Definition of the Diana operations, within what we argue is the mainstream framework for research animal ethics, namely one based on harm–benefit analysis. We explore issues of harms and benefits and how to balance them as well as how to reduce harm and increase benefit within neuroscience research.

SHOCK

chance

rectocele

逃避責(zé)任

Does the Goal Justify the Methods? Harm and Benefit in Neuroscience Research Using Animals, within what we argue is the mainstream framework for research animal ethics, namely one based on harm–benefit analysis. We explore issues of harms and benefits and how to balance them as well as how to reduce harm and increase benefit within neuroscience research.