找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ethical Issues in Behavioral Neuroscience; Grace Lee,Judy Illes,Frauke Ohl Book 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Behavior.Ethic

[復制鏈接]
樓主: ARSON
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 04:13:16 | 只看該作者
New Insights into Lynch Syndrome Diagnosis,sponsibly started, and once started adequately protect the interests of participants. We conclude with recommendations that industry sponsors of clinical trials should adopt in order to advance a collective and patient-centered research ethic.
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 08:52:10 | 只看該作者
Would the Elimination of the Capacity to Suffer Solve Ethical Dilemmas in Experimental Animal Reseaecent knockout experiments suggest that we already have, or are very close to having, the capacity to reduce suffering in laboratories via genetic engineering. If we are truly committed to balancing the advancement of science with the welfare of animals, this option should be further explored.
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 13:37:11 | 只看該作者
How Does Enhancing Cognition Affect Human Values? How Does This Translate into Social Responsibilitlikely to be undertaken. This paper explores the way values affect and are affected by enhancing cognitive abilities. Furthermore, it argues that knowledge of the interplay between values and cognitive enhancement makes a strong case for social responsibility around cognitive enhancement practices.
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 16:01:56 | 只看該作者
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 21:13:30 | 只看該作者
Externalization of Consciousness. Scientific Possibilities and Clinical Implications,ormed consent. Against this background, we argue for the necessity of further scientific efforts and ethical reflection in neurotechnological assessment of consciousness and ‘cerebral communication’ with verbally non-communicative patients.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 00:21:50 | 只看該作者
Definition of the Diana operations, within what we argue is the mainstream framework for research animal ethics, namely one based on harm–benefit analysis. We explore issues of harms and benefits and how to balance them as well as how to reduce harm and increase benefit within neuroscience research.
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 06:19:43 | 只看該作者
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:05:49 | 只看該作者
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 14:07:58 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:50:35 | 只看該作者
Does the Goal Justify the Methods? Harm and Benefit in Neuroscience Research Using Animals, within what we argue is the mainstream framework for research animal ethics, namely one based on harm–benefit analysis. We explore issues of harms and benefits and how to balance them as well as how to reduce harm and increase benefit within neuroscience research.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-20 04:04
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
托里县| 衡水市| 汉川市| 霍州市| 连江县| 兴海县| 洛浦县| 雅江县| 县级市| 湘潭县| 遵义县| 林西县| 武功县| 新民市| 融水| 泸州市| 芦溪县| 读书| 陇川县| 宁国市| 武山县| 赤壁市| 秦安县| 南陵县| 德保县| 吉水县| 呼图壁县| 娄底市| 府谷县| 吉林省| 郁南县| 泾川县| 广宗县| 太和县| 双流县| 五华县| 淅川县| 潼南县| 丰原市| 庆元县| 台州市|