Titlebook: Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley; Ernest Sosa Book 1987 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1987 George Berkeley.Germany.

VEER

書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley被引頻次




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley年度引用




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley讀者反饋




書目名稱Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Affluence

Something-I-Know-Not-What: Berkeley on Locke on Substanceof substance into question. His characterization of substance as a “something-I-know-not-what” that we merely suppose to underly the manifest qualities of things led Berkeley, it is claimed, to take the next step, deny that the notion of matter has any meaning at all, and in that way eliminate mater

憤世嫉俗者

咒語

權(quán)宜之計(jì)

Berkeley’s Imaginationhat it is sufficient to establish his immaterialism. He is, he says, “content to put the whole” upon the issue of whether his reader can “conceive it possible for one extended moveable substance, or in general, for any one idea or any thing like an idea, to exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving

忘恩負(fù)義的人

Berkeley on “Archetype”” in current use in philosophy, this other title would probably be considered just as acceptable, and long since justified by commentaries on immaterialism. However, Berkeley made a point of showing that some men with a name for learning merely fooled themselves with fine words and scholastic jargon

忘恩負(fù)義的人

Divine Ideas and Berkeley’S Proofs of God’s Existencehas argued that Berkeley hardly cared whether God maintains the continuity of the tree in the quad by perceiving it when we do not. In particular, the famous argument which purports to deduce God’s existence from the continuous existence of sensible things is represented by Bennett as no more than a

止痛藥

Berkeley’s Divine Language Argumenttient with the . too much apologetics and too little philosophy. There is one apparent exception. The fourth dialogue, ‘The Truth of Theism,’ contains a proof of God’s existence. But on a closer look many have found an unexciting version of the design argument, a version easily slain by Hume. T. E.

Psa617

Berkeley and Epistemologyo believe in such a thing. For Berkeley himself this was by no means the most important argument. In fact, it is not fully developed in the ., but only in sections 18-20 of the .. The reason for the secondary role accorded this argument by Berkeley is indicated by the opening sentence of section 18:

left-ventricle

On the Status of Visuals in Berkeley’s he theses presented and the arguments marshalled in their support is, for these sections, no easy task. Sections 48 and 49 are especially hard to interpret. Since this part of . is very important for Berkeley’s presentation of his new philosophical account of vision, a special effort to make sense o