Titlebook: Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics; Stefania Centrone Book 2017 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017 Edmund Huss

antihistamine

書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學科排名




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics被引頻次




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics年度引用




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics讀者反饋




書目名稱Essays on Husserl‘s Logic and Philosophy of Mathematics讀者反饋學科排名

glans-penis

Husserl and His Alter Ego Kant,anism for the title of transcendental philosophy. Some issues that Husserl is concerned with in Kant are bound up with the works of Lambert. Kant believed that the role played by principles of sensibility in metaphysics should be determined by a “general phenomenology” on which Lambert had written.

mitral-valve

Exhilarate

Husserl and Boole, and discussed in the work of early Husserl, focusing in particular on Husserl’s lecture “.” of 1895, in which an entire section is devoted to Boole. We confront Husserl’s representation of the problem-solving processes with the analysis of “symbolic reasoning” proposed by George Boole in the . (185

Volatile-Oils

Criteria

Criteria

concert

Husserl and Frege on Sense,ed that while the similarities between their views speak in favour of a Fregean interpretation of Husserl’s notion of noematic sense, there are also important differences. With regard to the latter, it is argued that Husserl’s view yields a more general criterion of propositional difference and also

確保

Husserl and Riemann,ematics, as well as on the distinction between sense and referent are either insignificant or, as in the last case, totally inexistent, and that Husserl’s account of Leibniz and Bolzano’s influence in . is correct, we turn to Riemann, whose influence is certainly non-negligible. Husserl’s conception

我悲傷

Husserl and Hilbert,lifelong friendship. After a brief account of the complementary nature of their early approaches, the paper focuses on Husserl’s . (1929) viewed as a response to Hilbert’s “new foundations” developed in the 1920s. While both Husserl and Hilbert share a “mathematics first,” nonrevisionist approach to