Titlebook: Essays in Socio-Economics; Amitai Etzioni Book 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999 A new paradigm.Altern.Decision Making Theory.Go

cherub

書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics被引頻次




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics年度引用




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics讀者反饋




書目名稱Essays in Socio-Economics讀者反饋學科排名

發(fā)電機

Yongkang Liu,Xuemin (Sherman) Shenservices is a vacuous goal, has followed a familiar tri-stage evolution—several times over. Radical rejections of the consumeristic goal have been followed by rejections of the rejections and new bouts of consumerism, leading to some kind of combination of an affirmation of the merits of a high leve

galley

Libido

P. Srinivasa Rao,D. Vasumathi,K. Sureshiring study. These assumptions allow economists to ignore preferences in most of their analyses, to treat them as a closed book. However, in the face of serious difficulties in explaining . in predicting major segments of economic behavior some economists expressed an interest in integrating economi

Vasodilation

Cognitive Science and Genetic Epistemology the fact that individual behavior is significantly affected by moral considerations. This article argues the merits of using an alternative approach: recognizing that individuals pursue at least two irreducible sources of value or “utility”, pleasure and morality. The possibility that some addition

助記

助記

Hernán Delgado,Alejandra Carboni generated a steady stream of discussion, criticisms, and applications but very little empirical research. The approach was developed in contrast to rationalist models of decision-making and to incrementalism. Rationalist approaches were held to be Utopian because actors cannot command the resources

achlorhydria

SpringerBriefs in Computer Scienceubject has increased sharply, as well as the number of policy-related schools, centers, and courses. At the same time, however, one finds little agreement on the nature and dimensions of the discipline, on the base of knowledge from which scholars and policy advisors ought to derive their formulatio

Dorsal

有常識

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42986-7to existing theoretical paradigms in the social sciences. Remarkably, despite the growing attention these movements have received, a careful examination of the similarities and differences between them has not been the subject of much study.. The discussion below will proceed by tracing the developm