找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Essay on Liberalism; Looking Left and Rig David F. B. Tucker Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994 John Rawls.Robert Noz

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 31372|回復(fù): 49
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:19:47 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Essay on Liberalism
副標(biāo)題Looking Left and Rig
編輯David F. B. Tucker
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/316/315235/315235.mp4
叢書名稱Nijhoff International Philosophy Series
圖書封面Titlebook: Essay on Liberalism; Looking Left and Rig David F. B. Tucker Book 1994 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994 John Rawls.Robert Noz
描述This book offers an introduction to liberal political philosophy, adopting an analytical form of presentation. I consider arguments which inform contemporary debates; by articulating paradigmatic ways of thinking and reviewing competing conceptions of justice and democracy, I hope to present a characterisation of contemporary liberal thought which allows the reader to gauge its potentiality and relevance, and to comprehend in a systematic way some of the many disagreements between liberal writers and the strengths and weaknesses of the claims they make. The reader should also become familiar with the arguments of the most forceful critics of the tradition. The exercise is intended to introduce a way of theorising and my emphasis will be on philosophical analysis and reconstruction. I aim to delineate a variety of intellectual positions in a way that displays their logical coherence. I examine competing conceptions of ‘democracy‘, ‘free speech‘, ‘equality‘ and ‘individualism‘ that inform our political debates in contemporary liberal democracies. These philosophical differences determine many of the policies adopted by governments, for example, whether they forbid racist and pornogra
出版日期Book 1994
關(guān)鍵詞John Rawls; Robert Nozick; freedom; ideology; issue; philosophy; political philosophy
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1096-9
isbn_softcover978-94-010-4479-0
isbn_ebook978-94-011-1096-9Series ISSN 0924-4530
issn_series 0924-4530
copyrightSpringer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1994
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Essay on Liberalism影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism被引頻次




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism年度引用




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism讀者反饋




書目名稱Essay on Liberalism讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:47:19 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:19:10 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:56:08 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5802-5All the writers who regard themselves as neo-liberals are thorough-going individualists, yet very few contemporary writers assume Lockean, “possessive individualism” or adopt a humanist approach. Nevertheless, there are some significant writers who do and it is worth examining their positions in detail.
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:01:56 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:44:10 | 只看該作者
Monica Corazza,Alessandro BorghiDespite everything said in favour of a liberal approach to political life, there has been sustained dissent by writers who express serious reservations. In this chapter I choose to review the work of two influential critics of liberalism.
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:06:58 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:31:00 | 只看該作者
Individualism, Egalitarianism and Rawls,In Chapter TWO we saw how Rawls offers a framework for a liberal theory that combines utilitarian perspectives with various individualist assumptions by appealing to ‘fairness’ as a relevant moral consideration. In this chapter I wish to look at his work in more detail. Let me begin by considering his account of Social Contract.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:29:38 | 只看該作者
Arblaster and Unger on Liberalism,Despite everything said in favour of a liberal approach to political life, there has been sustained dissent by writers who express serious reservations. In this chapter I choose to review the work of two influential critics of liberalism.
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:25:53 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38340-3mporary debates; by articulating paradigmatic ways of thinking and reviewing competing conceptions of justice and democracy, I hope to present a characterisation of contemporary liberal thought which allows the reader to gauge its potentiality and relevance, and to comprehend in a systematic way som
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-26 19:00
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
泊头市| 瑞昌市| 南丰县| 鲁山县| 九龙坡区| 镶黄旗| 防城港市| 积石山| 潞西市| 上饶县| 扶沟县| 嵊泗县| 揭东县| 崇州市| 青冈县| 乐亭县| 武宁县| 宁国市| 沙坪坝区| 延津县| 阳春市| 喀喇沁旗| 竹北市| 青海省| 大足县| 台中市| 荆门市| 龙游县| 元谋县| 安远县| 黄陵县| 龙岩市| 泰兴市| 若尔盖县| 茂名市| 吉隆县| 平谷区| 滨海县| 大埔县| 崇文区| 虎林市|