Titlebook: Error Reduction and Prevention in Surgical Pathology; Raouf E. Nakhleh Book 20151st edition Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

樹(shù)膠

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1005-3in close proximity to case sign-out so that patients are not impacted if diagnostic changes are made. While the optimal level of review is not known, studies have demonstrated that prevalent reviews are in the range of 8–10?% in the majority of pathology departments studied.

disparage

描述

opprobrious

Book 20151st editiondiagnosis of a tumor correctly determines the necessary therapy for that patient. Error Reduction and Prevention in Surgical Pathology focuses on how errors happen, the best systems to detect errors and the best systems to prevent errors. As with any form of testing, the test cycle in surgical patho

Exonerate

Introduction,d clinicians. A correct diagnosis sets the patient and clinician along an appropriate treatment path. At the same time, there is an understanding that surgical pathology processes and laboratories are complex systems that offer ample opportunity to make mistakes. Errors occur for a variety of reason

畏縮

The Landscape of Error in Surgical Pathology,root cause analysis of surgical amendments. They fit Charles Perrow’s definition of . they are untoward consequences of concentration, complexity, and tight couplings of steps within an information-driven production system. Electronic information transfer plays an ambiguous role in the system: it bo

MOTTO

盡忠

Accolade

Expostulate