找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy; David Levy Book 2013 David Levy 2013 love.philosophy.Plato.political philosophy.religious belief.S

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 49021|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:05:51 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy
編輯David Levy
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/315/314899/314899.mp4
叢書名稱Recovering Political Philosophy
圖書封面Titlebook: Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy;  David Levy Book 2013 David Levy 2013 love.philosophy.Plato.political philosophy.religious belief.S
描述Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy offers a new account of Plato‘s view of eros, or romantic love, by focusing on a question which has vexed many scholars: why does Plato‘s Socrates praise eros highly on some occasions but also criticize it harshly on others? Through detailed analyses of Plato‘s Republic, Phaedrus, and Symposium, Levy shows how, despite the apparent tensions between Socrates‘ statements about eros in each dialogue, these statements supplement each other well and serve to clarify Socrates‘ understanding of the complex relationship between eros, religious belief, and philosophy. Thus, Levy‘s interpretation sheds new light not only on Plato‘s view of eros, but also on his view of piety and philosophy, challenging common assumptions about the erotic nature of Socratic philosophy. This novel approach to classic political theory will incite discussion and interest among scholars of classics, philosophy, and political theory.
出版日期Book 2013
關(guān)鍵詞love; philosophy; Plato; political philosophy; religious belief; Socrates; Symposium; The Republic
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781137342713
isbn_softcover978-1-349-46645-0
isbn_ebook978-1-137-34271-3Series ISSN 2524-7166 Series E-ISSN 2524-7174
issn_series 2524-7166
copyrightDavid Levy 2013
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy被引頻次




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy年度引用




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy讀者反饋




書目名稱Eros and Socratic Political Philosophy讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:05:17 | 只看該作者
2524-7166 exed many scholars: why does Plato‘s Socrates praise eros highly on some occasions but also criticize it harshly on others? Through detailed analyses of Plato‘s Republic, Phaedrus, and Symposium, Levy shows how, despite the apparent tensions between Socrates‘ statements about eros in each dialogue,
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:08:45 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:18:24 | 只看該作者
Causal Concepts, Principles, and Algorithmsof . is to facilitate all interaction between gods and human beings (202e2ff.); it is through . that the whole art of the priests, prophecy, and sorcery take place, as well as all communication from gods to human beings (202e7–203a3).
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 12:44:36 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:35:00 | 只看該作者
,Socrates’s , Speech,of . is to facilitate all interaction between gods and human beings (202e2ff.); it is through . that the whole art of the priests, prophecy, and sorcery take place, as well as all communication from gods to human beings (202e7–203a3).
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 18:38:16 | 只看該作者
Recovering Political Philosophyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/314899.jpg
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:55:54 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:39:02 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:08:50 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11036-9Socrates about eros: his curious tendency to waver in his evaluations of it, his praising eros to the heavens on one occasion only to criticize it most harshly on another. It could seem that Socrates is confused about eros. If he were, he would not be alone in his confusion. As the poets attest, som
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 03:07
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
漳州市| 长阳| 邯郸县| 莒南县| 上林县| 辉县市| 澜沧| 西峡县| 婺源县| 左贡县| 资阳市| 阿拉善右旗| 宜昌市| 吉林省| 舞阳县| 泰安市| 广昌县| 靖州| 盘山县| 静宁县| 宜州市| 黔西| 南澳县| 嘉祥县| 嘉义县| 巫山县| 弥勒县| 包头市| 迁西县| 犍为县| 江门市| 武安市| 托克逊县| 茌平县| 昌乐县| 东莞市| 武城县| 麟游县| 萨迦县| 杨浦区| 阿克陶县|