Titlebook: Ernest Sosa; Targeting His Philos Amrei Bahr,Markus Seidel Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

損壞

Yes There Can! Rehabilitating Philosophy as a Scientific Discipline,fic discipline. Recently, the X-Phi movement has added another twist to the discussion about philosophy’s scientific status by challenging philosophy’s reliance on intuitions in the context of philosophical reasoning. Ernest Sosa has prominently responded to some of the challenges raised by X-Phi in

NIB

反復(fù)拉緊

A Snowslide of Entities,e further clarification. First, we distinguish three alternative readings of Sosa’s account – the indexicalist, the homonymist and the (proper) relativist reading – and argue that they differ with respect to two crucial points: (a) they lead to different analyses of the lack of disagreement in exist

寬容

What Makes My Thought About X a Thought About ,?,concerning the relationship of language, mind and world belongs to the most important questions of theoretical philosophy. In our paper, we take a closer look at Sosa’s modified Fregean proposal in order to find out if it provides a satisfactory answer to the modified Wittgensteinian question. We pr

Exhilarate

Replies,earlier years, and I very much appreciated the opportunity to think about them again and to try to put them in perspective with the stimulus of the critical teams’ focused attention. I am very pleased and grateful for the intense attention and challenge to my views, and for the excellent comments. I

novelty

有說服力