Titlebook: Ernest Sosa; Targeting His Philos Amrei Bahr,Markus Seidel Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive licen

neutralize

FELON

同位素

強(qiáng)制令

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20367-4epistemic luck”. It must derive from competence rather than luck. Knowledge, then, is a judgment or belief that aims at truth and attains accuracy not by luck but through the agent’s cognitive adroitness, so that the attainment is apt. A higher grade of knowledge then requires that the agent attain

CRP743

不能強(qiáng)迫我

語源學(xué)

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-04688-0ns are incapable of applying even simple logical rules. Ernest Sosa argues that their argument rests on a faulty concept of rationality. On Sosa’s view, rationality cannot be defined in terms of adherence to rules of logic and probability; instead, he holds rationality to be both multidimensional an

cylinder

Accuracy, speed and power relation,fic discipline. Recently, the X-Phi movement has added another twist to the discussion about philosophy’s scientific status by challenging philosophy’s reliance on intuitions in the context of philosophical reasoning. Ernest Sosa has prominently responded to some of the challenges raised by X-Phi in

要控制

Indent